Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for c…
This bill amends section 1842(b)(6) of the Social Security Act to allow physical therapists to use Medicare locum tenens arrangements for outpatient physical therapy services. It directs that the same subparagraph (D) rules that apply to physicians’ locum tenens services apply to physical therapists.
Liberals stress patient access and continuity benefits
Narrow, low-controversy administrative fix likely to attract bipartisan support, though needs committee/floor scheduling.
This bill amends section 1842(b)(6) of the Social Security Act to allow physical therapists to use Medicare locum tenens arrangements for outpatient physical therapy services.
It directs that the same subparagraph (D) rules that apply to physicians’ locum tenens services apply to physical therapists.
The change applies to items and services furnished after the date of enactment.
Low policy controversy and limited fiscal impact increase chances, but standalone legislative calendar and procedural hurdles reduce odds.
How solid the drafting looks.
Liberals stress patient access and continuity benefits
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals stress patient access and continuity benefits
Likely supportive.
The change increases continuity of care and access to outpatient therapy, especially in underserved or rural areas.
Advocates would view this as a modest, targeted expansion of access that can reduce care interruptions for vulnerable patients.
Cautiously supportive if accompanied by oversight.
The proposal is a narrow technical change with plausible benefits for access and continuity, but it raises standard fiscal and anti-fraud questions that merit clarification.
Skeptical.
While the bill is narrow, conservatives will be wary of expanding Medicare rules and increasing potential program spending and fraud risk.
Many would want strict limits and oversight before supporting.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low policy controversy and limited fiscal impact increase chances, but standalone legislative calendar and procedural hurdles reduce odds.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals stress patient access and continuity benefits
Low policy controversy and limited fiscal impact increase chances, but standalone legislative calendar and procedural hurdles reduce odds.
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Prevent Interruptions in Physical Therapy Act of 2025.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.