Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
The bill amends 5 U.S.C. 6103(a) to add Election Day to the list of federal legal public holidays. It would make Election Day a federal holiday for federal employees and federal agencies.
Liberal emphasizes turnout and civic signal
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill makes a narrowly targeted statutory change by inserting 'Election Day' into the list of Federal holidays in 5 U.S.C. §6103(a).
The bill amends 5 U.S.C. 6103(a) to add Election Day to the list of federal legal public holidays.
It would make Election Day a federal holiday for federal employees and federal agencies.
The bill text does not itself change state election laws, private employer obligations, or voting procedures.
Narrow and administratively simple, but election symbolism, fiscal concerns, and lack of implementation detail reduce probability absent bipartisan leadership support.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill makes a narrowly targeted statutory change by inserting 'Election Day' into the list of Federal holidays in 5 U.S.C. §6103(a). The drafting is concise and precisely locates the amendment, but it omits several details normally relevant to implementing a new federal holiday, including a clear calendaring definition, effective date, fiscal acknowledgment, and guidance for agency implementation.
Liberal emphasizes turnout and civic signal
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberal emphasizes turnout and civic signal
This persona is likely to view the bill favorably as a pro-voter access measure that reduces barriers to voting.
They see federal recognition of Election Day as an important civic signal.
They may note it is insufficient alone and prefer complementary measures to increase turnout.
A centrist would see the bill as a modest, low-cost step to encourage voting but would want clarity on real-world effects.
They would weigh potential turnout benefits against administrative costs and equity for private-sector workers.
They would favor complementary practical measures rather than symbolic change alone.
A mainstream conservative would be skeptical, seeing a new federal holiday as unnecessary federal expansion.
They would question effectiveness for turnout and worry about costs and disruptions.
They may be especially concerned it offers a symbolic political advantage without addressing practical election integrity or access measures.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow and administratively simple, but election symbolism, fiscal concerns, and lack of implementation detail reduce probability absent bipartisan leadership support.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberal emphasizes turnout and civic signal
Narrow and administratively simple, but election symbolism, fiscal concerns, and lack of implementation detail reduce probability absent bi…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill makes a narrowly targeted statutory change by inserting 'Election Day' into the list of Federal holidays in 5 U.S.C. §6103(a). The drafting is concise and precisely l…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.