H.R. 1568 (119th)Bill Overview

African Burial Ground International Memorial Museum and Educational Center Act

Arts, Culture, Religion|Arts, Culture, Religion
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 25, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill establishes the African Burial Ground International Memorial Museum and Educational Center at the African Burial Ground National Monument in New York City. It authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire nearby property, build and operate the museum in partnership with federal, state, city, and private entities, and associate it with the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture.

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize memorialization, descendant involvement, and research ethics

Watch point

Cultural/local project with bipartisan appeal; main hurdle is appropriation timing and competing floor priorities.

This bill establishes the African Burial Ground International Memorial Museum and Educational Center at the African Burial Ground National Monument in New York City.

It authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire nearby property, build and operate the museum in partnership with federal, state, city, and private entities, and associate it with the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture.

The federal government would pay two-thirds of acquisition and construction costs; initial appropriations include $15 million for FY2025 and unspecified sums thereafter.

Passage45/100

Low controversy and local support improve prospects, but actual enactment depends on future appropriations and congressional scheduling.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention55/100

Liberals emphasize memorialization, descendant involvement, and research ethics

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLocal governments · Federal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitCreates infrastructure likely to attract domestic and international visitors to Lower Manhattan, boosting tourism reven…
  • Federal agenciesFederal funding covering two-thirds of capital costs reduces immediate financial pressure on state and city budgets.
  • Potential benefitConstruction and museum operations may generate short-term construction and long-term cultural sector jobs.
Likely burdened
  • Local governmentsFederal acquisition and monument expansion could provoke disputes over property rights or local land use.
  • Federal agenciesInitial and ongoing federal costs may increase demands on appropriations and future federal budgets.
  • Potential burdenExempting two staff from civil service rules may raise concerns about hiring transparency and accountability.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize memorialization, descendant involvement, and research ethics
Progressive90%

Overall supportive.

The bill memorializes enslaved Africans, promotes public education, and strengthens museum partnerships with HBCUs and the Smithsonian.

Advocates will seek stronger wording on descendant community control, ethical handling of remains and DNA, and guarantees of long-term funding and accessibility.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally supportive but pragmatic.

The bill preserves an important historic site and aims to leverage federal, local, and private cooperation.

Concerns focus on cost clarity, acquisition logistics, and oversight to ensure efficient use of funds and timely delivery.

Leans supportive
Conservative35%

Cautious to skeptical.

While not opposing commemoration of history, this persona worries about expanded federal spending and footprint in New York, potential politicized narratives, and special hiring authorities.

Support depends on tighter fiscal limits and local/private funding commitments.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Low controversy and local support improve prospects, but actual enactment depends on future appropriations and congressional scheduling.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No formal cost estimate or GAO/CBO score included
  • Extent of local/state/private funding to cover nonfederal share
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize memorialization, descendant involvement, and research ethics

Low controversy and local support improve prospects, but actual enactment depends on future appropriations and congressional scheduling.

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for African Burial Ground International Memorial Museum and Educat…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis