- Potential benefitIncreases voter registrations via automatic registration across contributing agencies.
- Potential benefitStandardizes mail-in ballot procedures and deadlines, aiming to make processing more uniform and timely.
- Potential benefitAccelerates reporting and counting, requiring ballots counted and reported within 24 hours.
Restoring Faith in Elections Act
Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, i…
The Restoring Faith in Elections Act sets federal rules for mail-in ballots, standardizes result reporting, requires automatic voter registration (AVR) through government agencies, mandates parity and uniform administration across jurisdictions, and creates a CISA-run National Deconfliction Voting Database. It also requires pre-election maintenance of voter rolls, prescribes motor-vehicle attestation about residency for voter purposes, and authorizes grants to help States implement AVR and related IT upgrades.
Progressives emphasize AVR access; conservative fears automatic registration risks.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed substantive policy proposal with strong statutory specificity and careful integration into existing election law, and with significant administrative components assigned to federal and state actors.
The Restoring Faith in Elections Act sets federal rules for mail-in ballots, standardizes result reporting, requires automatic voter registration (AVR) through government agencies, mandates parity and uniform administration across jurisdictions, and creates a CISA-run National Deconfliction Voting Database.
It also requires pre-election maintenance of voter rolls, prescribes motor-vehicle attestation about residency for voter purposes, and authorizes grants to help States implement AVR and related IT upgrades.
Comprehensive, contentious federal election overhaul with fiscal and federalism implications faces significant legislative and legal obstacles despite some technocratic elements.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed substantive policy proposal with strong statutory specificity and careful integration into existing election law, and with significant administrative components assigned to federal and state actors.
Progressives emphasize AVR access; conservative fears automatic registration risks.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Federal agenciesExpands federal authority over state election administration, potentially triggering legal and jurisdictional disputes.
- StatesCentralized CISA database raises privacy and cybersecurity risks from storing statewide voter records.
- Potential burdenNew criminal penalties and limits on third-party ballot possession may restrict assistance to disabled or remote voters.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Progressives emphasize AVR access; conservative fears automatic registration risks.
Generally supportive of modernization and expanded registration access via automatic voter registration, grants, and NIST privacy standards.
Concerned about provisions that could restrict valid mail-in voting (signature verification, receipt deadlines, criminal penalties for ballot possession) and possible privacy risks from a national clearinghouse.
Favorable toward policies that increase consistency, reduce duplicate registrations, and improve reporting speed, while cautious about federal mandates, implementation capacity, and unintended impacts.
Wants clearer operational detail, adequate funding, and phased implementation to avoid disenfranchisement or chaos.
Supportive of many integrity-focused measures: stricter mail-in standards, limits on third-party ballot possession, parity rules, and a deconfliction database to prevent double registrations.
Skeptical or opposed to mandatory automatic registration and a CISA-controlled national clearinghouse as federal overreach.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Comprehensive, contentious federal election overhaul with fiscal and federalism implications faces significant legislative and legal obstacles despite some technocratic elements.
- Estimated federal and state implementation costs and offsets
- Litigation risk over federal preemption and data transfers
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Progressives emphasize AVR access; conservative fears automatic registration risks.
Comprehensive, contentious federal election overhaul with fiscal and federalism implications faces significant legislative and legal obstac…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed substantive policy proposal with strong statutory specificity and careful integration into existing election law, and with significant administrative co…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.