H.R. 1613 (119th)Bill Overview

Protecting Mushroom Farmers Act

Agriculture and Food|Agriculture and Food
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
Feb 26, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities, Risk Management, and Credit.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The Protecting Mushroom Farmers Act directs the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation to conduct research and development, or contract for R&D, to design an insurance policy covering mushroom production and mushroom growing media. The R&D must evaluate pest, fungal, and viral risks; other causes of loss like power outages and extreme rainfall; best practices; coverage structure; streamlined reporting; and revenue protection.

Why people may split

Scope and cost: left favors expansion; right worries about federal exposure

Watch point

Narrow, technical farm-policy bill likely attracts bipartisan support in House agriculture contexts; modest fiscal implications may draw limited scrutiny.

The Protecting Mushroom Farmers Act directs the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation to conduct research and development, or contract for R&D, to design an insurance policy covering mushroom production and mushroom growing media.

The R&D must evaluate pest, fungal, and viral risks; other causes of loss like power outages and extreme rainfall; best practices; coverage structure; streamlined reporting; and revenue protection.

The Corporation must make such a policy available if the statutory requirements of section 508(h) are met, and submit a report with results and recommendations to congressional agriculture committees within two years.

Passage60/100

Narrow, technical agriculture measure with low controversy and built-in study/reporting features often clear committees or are folded into broader farm legislation.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention30/100

Scope and cost: left favors expansion; right worries about federal exposure

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitCreates a tailored insurance option reducing financial risk for mushroom producers.
  • Potential benefitMay stabilize farm revenue and improve credit access for small-scale mushroom operations.
  • Potential benefitResearch could improve pest and pathogen management guidance for the mushroom sector.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesDeveloping and administering new policies will impose additional federal actuarial and administrative costs.
  • Federal agenciesIf offered broadly, new policies could increase federal spending through premium subsidies or program costs.
  • Potential burdenDiverse mushroom species and indoor systems may complicate actuarial pricing and increase premiums.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Scope and cost: left favors expansion; right worries about federal exposure
Progressive85%

Overall supportive: this bill targets a niche agricultural sector often overlooked by federal risk programs.

It funds tailored research, recognizes specific biological and operational risks, and could extend revenue protection to specialty and small-scale mushroom producers.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally favorable but pragmatic: the bill is a limited, targeted federal action requiring research and a report.

It balances taking action for an underinsured crop with oversight through mandated evaluation and Congressional reporting.

Leans supportive
Conservative55%

Cautiously mixed: conservatives will weigh support for farm risk management against concerns about expanding federal insurance and new taxpayer exposure.

Because the bill mandates study rather than immediate subsidies, some may accept it while wanting strict fiscal and actuarial safeguards.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood60/100

Narrow, technical agriculture measure with low controversy and built-in study/reporting features often clear committees or are folded into broader farm legislation.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or appropriation included
  • FCIC/RMA capacity and willingness to implement
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Scope and cost: left favors expansion; right worries about federal exposure

Narrow, technical agriculture measure with low controversy and built-in study/reporting features often clear committees or are folded into…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Protecting Mushroom Farmers Act.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis