H.R. 1614 (119th)Bill Overview

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expand practitioners eligible to furnish telehealth services under the Medicare program.

Health|Computers and information technologyHealth
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Feb 26, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for c…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill would amend section 1834(m)(4)(E) of the Social Security Act to expand which practitioners may furnish telehealth services under Medicare. The statutory subsection is being replaced or revised to broaden eligible practitioners, but the provided text is incomplete and does not specify which practitioner types or payment details.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes access, equity, behavioral health benefits

Watch point

Narrow, technical Medicare change with likely bipartisan support; calendar and committee hurdles remain.

This bill would amend section 1834(m)(4)(E) of the Social Security Act to expand which practitioners may furnish telehealth services under Medicare.

The statutory subsection is being replaced or revised to broaden eligible practitioners, but the provided text is incomplete and does not specify which practitioner types or payment details.

Passage45/100

A small, technical Medicare expansion tends to have moderate chance, but missing specifics and fiscal uncertainty lower probability.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention62/100

Liberal emphasizes access, equity, behavioral health benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitBroadens patient access to clinicians via telehealth, especially in rural or underserved areas.
  • Potential benefitReduces patient travel time and associated nonmedical costs.
  • Potential benefitAllows more provider types to offer telehealth, increasing service delivery flexibility.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenMay raise Medicare program spending by increasing reimbursed telehealth encounters.
  • Potential burdenCould create higher fraud and improper payment risk without strengthened controls.
  • Potential burdenQuality of care concerns if telehealth substitutes for necessary in-person services.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes access, equity, behavioral health benefits
Progressive85%

Likely broadly supportive because expanding telehealth eligibility can increase access for underserved populations and behavioral health patients.

Support hinges on ensuring inclusion of nonphysician providers, payment parity, privacy protections, and anti-fraud safeguards — details not specified in the bill text.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Cautiously favorable toward expanding telehealth access, but concerned about costs, definitional clarity, and quality controls.

Would favor targeted, evidence-based expansion with reporting, pilots, and guardrails to monitor fiscal and clinical impacts.

Split reaction
Conservative40%

Skeptical of broad federal expansion allowing more practitioner types to bill Medicare for telehealth.

May welcome improved rural access, but worries about federal overreach, higher Medicare outlays, fraud risk, and encroachment on state licensure and traditional practice boundaries.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

A small, technical Medicare expansion tends to have moderate chance, but missing specifics and fiscal uncertainty lower probability.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Exact practitioner categories to be added are not shown
  • No cost estimate or CBO score included
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes access, equity, behavioral health benefits

A small, technical Medicare expansion tends to have moderate chance, but missing specifics and fiscal uncertainty lower probability.

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expand prac…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis