H.R. 1624 (119th)Bill Overview

Supporting Farm Operations Act of 2025

Immigration|Immigration
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
Feb 26, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill directs the Secretary of Labor to keep each State's adverse effect wage rate (AEWR) for H‑2A agricultural workers at the level that was in effect on December 31, 2023, through December 31, 2026. It also requires the Department to use a primary‑duties evaluation when determining the applicable wage for employees who perform multiple tasks.

Why people may split

Worker wage increases versus farm cost and predictability

Watch point

Narrow, sector‑specific change likely to attract support from agricultural interests and some colleagues; opposition possible from labor advocates.

The bill directs the Secretary of Labor to keep each State's adverse effect wage rate (AEWR) for H‑2A agricultural workers at the level that was in effect on December 31, 2023, through December 31, 2026.

It also requires the Department to use a primary‑duties evaluation when determining the applicable wage for employees who perform multiple tasks.

Passage40/100

Content is narrow and administrable, but touches contentious labor/immigration policy; moderate stakeholder opposition and Senate hurdles lower prospects.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention68/100

Worker wage increases versus farm cost and predictability

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Workers · StatesWorkers

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • WorkersProvides predictable labor cost levels for farm employers by freezing AEWRs through December 31, 2026.
  • Potential benefitPrevents scheduled AEWR increases from raising wage costs for growers during the freeze period.
  • StatesReduces administrative adjustment burdens by maintaining existing state wage rates and clarifying classification.
Likely burdened
  • WorkersFreezing AEWR likely reduces wage gains for H-2A workers relative to inflation and planned increases.
  • WorkersMay weaken market wage pressure, indirectly lowering pay prospects for domestic farmworkers.
  • WorkersConstrains Department of Labor flexibility to adjust AEWR based on changing labor market data.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Worker wage increases versus farm cost and predictability
Progressive20%

Likely viewed negatively: freezes a wage floor that could otherwise rise, potentially harming seasonal agricultural workers.

The primary‑duties clause raises concerns about narrowing classifications to avoid higher pay.

Likely resistant
Centrist55%

A mixed view: appreciates predictability for agriculture and supply chains, but worries the freeze could lock in inadequate wages and invite legal or administrative complications.

Sees tradeoffs worth managing.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Likely supportive: prevents retroactive or unanticipated wage hikes that raise farm labor costs, and the primary‑duties rule offers administrative clarity.

Seen as protecting agricultural competitiveness.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Content is narrow and administrable, but touches contentious labor/immigration policy; moderate stakeholder opposition and Senate hurdles lower prospects.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No Congressional Budget Office or cost estimate provided
  • Stakeholder reactions (farm groups vs. worker advocates)
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Worker wage increases versus farm cost and predictability

Content is narrow and administrable, but touches contentious labor/immigration policy; moderate stakeholder opposition and Senate hurdles l…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Supporting Farm Operations Act of 2025.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis