Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
This bill amends section 213A of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act to extend duty-free treatment for Haiti through September 30, 2035, sets the applicable yarn-forward percentage at 60 percent, raises the annual quantitative apparel limit to 1.25% of aggregate square meter equivalents of U.S. apparel imports, and instructs the President to modify the Harmonized Tariff Schedule to restore eligibility for certain articles that lost preferential status due to prior HTS revisions. The President must report reasons for any HTS modifications to congressional tax and trade committees, and proclamations take effect after a short reporting period.
Liberals emphasize Haitian economic development and job creation benefits.
Narrow, technical trade fix likely to attract bipartisan support, though textile interests may oppose.
This bill amends section 213A of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act to extend duty-free treatment for Haiti through September 30, 2035, sets the applicable yarn-forward percentage at 60 percent, raises the annual quantitative apparel limit to 1.25% of aggregate square meter equivalents of U.S. apparel imports, and instructs the President to modify the Harmonized Tariff Schedule to restore eligibility for certain articles that lost preferential status due to prior HTS revisions.
The President must report reasons for any HTS modifications to congressional tax and trade committees, and proclamations take effect after a short reporting period.
Technically narrow and administrable so plausibly passable, but industry opposition and Senate procedural barriers create meaningful uncertainty.
How solid the drafting looks.
Liberals emphasize Haitian economic development and job creation benefits.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize Haitian economic development and job creation benefits.
Likely broadly supportive because the bill extends trade preferences aimed at economic development in Haiti and job creation.
Concerned about absence of explicit labor, environmental, or human-rights enforcement measures and will seek safeguards or oversight.
Generally favorable if the extension is cost-effective and monitored; views it as a targeted trade tool for development and foreign policy.
Wants clearer oversight, measurable metrics, and limited fiscal or trade disruption risk.
Skeptical of an extended, country-specific tariff preference that picks winners and alters trade rules.
Some may accept it for narrow foreign policy reasons, but many will object without fiscal safeguards and strict eligibility conditions.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technically narrow and administrable so plausibly passable, but industry opposition and Senate procedural barriers create meaningful uncertainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize Haitian economic development and job creation benefits.
Technically narrow and administrable so plausibly passable, but industry opposition and Senate procedural barriers create meaningful uncert…
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Haiti Economic Lift Program Extension Act of 2025.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.