H.R. 167 (119th)Bill Overview

Community Reclamation Partnerships Act of 2025

Environmental Protection|CoalEnvironmental assessment, monitoring, research
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 3, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

Amends the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act to authorize State memoranda of understanding with federal agencies for remediation of pre-1977 abandoned coal mine drainage and to create a ‘‘Community Reclaimer’’ partnership mechanism. States may submit Community Reclaimer project proposals for Secretary approval with detailed submission requirements, contingency plans, public notice, and EPA concurrence; approved memoranda become part of State reclamation plans.

Why people may split

Liability shift: liberals worry; conservatives accept State responsibility.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy change that is reasonably well constructed: it adds discrete authorities and processes to SMCRA, integrates with existing statutes, and defines many operational elements for State memorandum and project approvals.

Amends the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act to authorize State memoranda of understanding with federal agencies for remediation of pre-1977 abandoned coal mine drainage and to create a ‘‘Community Reclaimer’’ partnership mechanism.

States may submit Community Reclaimer project proposals for Secretary approval with detailed submission requirements, contingency plans, public notice, and EPA concurrence; approved memoranda become part of State reclamation plans.

The bill allows limited reprocessing of historic mine residues if proceeds reimburse remediation costs, clarifies State liability when actions follow an approved memorandum, adds such projects to State plan content, and sunsets on September 30, 2032.

Passage50/100

Technocratic, regionally beneficial bill with modest controversy; success hinges on resolving liability and environmental concerns in committee.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy change that is reasonably well constructed: it adds discrete authorities and processes to SMCRA, integrates with existing statutes, and defines many operational elements for State memorandum and project approvals. It contains specific procedural requirements (public notice, project submittals, contingency plans) and a clear approval timeline.

Contention45/100

Liability shift: liberals worry; conservatives accept State responsibility.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsTaxpayers · Permitting process

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Local governmentsCreates local jobs in construction, monitoring, and long‑term operation of remediation projects.
  • Potential benefitImproves water quality and ecosystem restoration at abandoned coal mine sites.
  • Potential benefitLeverages private capital and expertise to expand the scope of reclamation work.
Likely burdened
  • TaxpayersStates assume financial responsibility for projects, potentially exposing taxpayers to cleanup costs.
  • Potential burdenReprocessing historic mine residue could create new environmental or health risks if mismanaged.
  • Permitting processMay permit participation by entities with existing reclamation liabilities, raising conflict‑of‑interest concerns.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liability shift: liberals worry; conservatives accept State responsibility.
Progressive70%

Likely to welcome increased activity to remediate mine drainage and restore communities but will be cautious about privatized cleanup and liability shifts.

Support will hinge on strong environmental safeguards, transparency, enforceable monitoring, and prevention of private profit motives undermining cleanup quality.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Views the bill as a pragmatic tool to accelerate abandoned-mine remediation by combining State authority and private capacity, balanced by EPA and Secretary review.

Will emphasize cost controls, clear liability assignment, and measurable outcomes before endorsing broad adoption.

Leans supportive
Conservative75%

Likely to favor State-led, voluntary partnerships with private actors and reduced federal intervention in direct cleanup.

May object to added federal approval steps or any provisions that create new federal spending or regulatory burdens, but generally supportive if states retain control.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood50/100

Technocratic, regionally beneficial bill with modest controversy; success hinges on resolving liability and environmental concerns in committee.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or appropriations mechanism provided
  • State willingness to assume indemnity and long-term O&M costs
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liability shift: liberals worry; conservatives accept State responsibility.

Technocratic, regionally beneficial bill with modest controversy; success hinges on resolving liability and environmental concerns in commi…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy change that is reasonably well constructed: it adds discrete authorities and processes to SMCRA, integrates with existing statutes, and define…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis