Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
This bill (UPLIFT Act) amends existing federal immigration statutes to prohibit State or local laws that restrict cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. It expands permitted local law‑enforcement activities regarding immigration status, authorizes and protects agreements with private immigration detention facilities, and strengthens ICE detainer authority and timelines.
Progressives stress civil‑liberties and community policing harms
Content aligns with strong enforcement constituencies but is highly polarizing; likely to divide along ideological lines in the House.
This bill (UPLIFT Act) amends existing federal immigration statutes to prohibit State or local laws that restrict cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.
It expands permitted local law‑enforcement activities regarding immigration status, authorizes and protects agreements with private immigration detention facilities, and strengthens ICE detainer authority and timelines.
The bill creates standing for localities to sue States over noncompliance, requires annual DHS compliance reports, grants immunity to jurisdictions complying with detainers, and allows certain crime victims to sue jurisdictions that declined detainers.
Substantial federalism and civil‑liberties conflicts, litigation risk, and lack of built‑in compromises make enactment unlikely without major revisions.
How solid the drafting looks.
Progressives stress civil‑liberties and community policing harms
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives stress civil‑liberties and community policing harms
Likely to oppose the bill overall.
Concerns would center on civil liberties, community policing impacts, racial profiling risks, and expansion of private detention.
Support might be offered only if strong due‑process and civil‑rights safeguards are added.
Mixed view: recognizes need to disrupt transnational crime and improve information sharing, but wary of federal overreach and legal defensibility.
Would weigh benefits against risks to public trust, costs, and court challenges.
Likely to strongly support the bill.
It removes sanctuary protections, compels cooperation, strengthens ICE detainer authority, enables private detention partnerships, and creates accountability for jurisdictions that release dangerous aliens.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Substantial federalism and civil‑liberties conflicts, litigation risk, and lack of built‑in compromises make enactment unlikely without major revisions.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives stress civil‑liberties and community policing harms
Substantial federalism and civil‑liberties conflicts, litigation risk, and lack of built‑in compromises make enactment unlikely without maj…
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for UPLIFT Act.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.