H.R. 1682 (119th)Bill Overview

BELO’S Act

Armed Forces and National Security|Armed Forces and National SecurityMilitary personnel and dependents
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Feb 27, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill (BELO’S Act) amends the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to grant lifetime National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands passes to survivors who are entitled to a death gratuity under 10 U.S.C. §1475 or dependency and indemnity compensation under 38 U.S.C. (chapter 13). It adds these survivors explicitly to the classes eligible for lifetime federal recreation passes.

Why people may split

Magnitude of fiscal impact and lost fee revenue

Watch point

Simple, narrowly targeted benefit for military survivors; historically such measures attract broad support.

The bill (BELO’S Act) amends the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to grant lifetime National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands passes to survivors who are entitled to a death gratuity under 10 U.S.C. §1475 or dependency and indemnity compensation under 38 U.S.C. (chapter 13).

It adds these survivors explicitly to the classes eligible for lifetime federal recreation passes.

Passage65/100

Narrow, low-cost, veterans-survivor benefit with broad appeal increases chance; final outcome depends on Senate procedures and scheduling.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention18/100

Magnitude of fiscal impact and lost fee revenue

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governments · Federal agenciesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitProvides free lifetime outdoor access as a tangible honor for families of fallen service members.
  • Local governmentsLikely increases park visitation by eligible families, supporting local recreation spending.
  • Federal agenciesReduces individual financial barriers to national parks and federal recreational lands for survivors.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenReduces fee revenue collected at some sites, potentially affecting maintenance funding.
  • Potential burdenCreates administrative costs for verification and issuance of additional lifetime passes.
  • Potential burdenMay set a precedent encouraging future expansions of free-pass categories and revenue erosion.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Magnitude of fiscal impact and lost fee revenue
Progressive92%

Likely supportive.

The bill directly aids military survivors and expands public-land access, fitting progressive priorities of supporting bereaved families and equitable access to nature.

Any concerns would focus on ensuring inclusivity and that the benefit reaches eligible families without burdensome proof requirements.

Leans supportive
Centrist78%

Generally favorable but pragmatic.

The measure is narrowly tailored, symbolic, and low-cost, so it is attractive.

Centrists will want basic cost estimates, implementation details, and assurances that the change is administratively efficient and fiscally reasonable.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Likely supportive overall, viewing it as an honorable, narrowly focused recognition of fallen service members.

Some conservatives may still question any expansion of federal benefits or recurring costs, but the bill’s limited scope reduces opposition.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood65/100

Narrow, low-cost, veterans-survivor benefit with broad appeal increases chance; final outcome depends on Senate procedures and scheduling.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or CBO score included in text
  • Potential overlap with existing pass-authority or eligibility rules
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Magnitude of fiscal impact and lost fee revenue

Narrow, low-cost, veterans-survivor benefit with broad appeal increases chance; final outcome depends on Senate procedures and scheduling.

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for BELO’S Act.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis