Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Amends the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 to increase leasing frequency and require replacement lease sales if delayed. Requires the Interior Secretary to offer all nominated, eligible parcels in specified states during sales.
Progressives emphasize environmental and tribal consultation risks
Narrow, pro-development bill likely attractive to supporters of faster energy permitting; opposition from environmental stakeholders could slow momentum.
Amends the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 to increase leasing frequency and require replacement lease sales if delayed.
Requires the Interior Secretary to offer all nominated, eligible parcels in specified states during sales.
Imposes deadlines for geothermal drilling permit processing: a 30‑day completeness notice and a 30‑day final decision after completeness.
Narrow and administratively prescriptive but politically sensitive on environmental and permitting grounds; likely to face debate, amendments, or legal challenges.
How solid the drafting looks.
Progressives emphasize environmental and tribal consultation risks
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize environmental and tribal consultation risks
Generally supportive of accelerating renewable geothermal deployment, but wary that strict deadlines and mandatory parcel offerings could weaken environmental review and tribal consultation.
Sees potential climate and jobs benefits but wants safeguards to protect sensitive lands and communities.
Concerned about rushed NEPA, habitat impacts, and meaningful public input.
Likely to view the bill as a practical effort to streamline permitting and spur domestic renewables, while flagging implementation risks.
Wants funding and agency capacity to meet firm deadlines without sacrificing legal compliance.
Open to the bill with targeted safeguards and resource commitments.
Strongly favorable: the bill reduces bureaucratic delays, mandates offering available parcels, and accelerates domestic energy development.
Views deadlines and replacement‑sale rules as pro‑development reforms that unlock public‑land resources and economic growth.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow and administratively prescriptive but politically sensitive on environmental and permitting grounds; likely to face debate, amendments, or legal challenges.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize environmental and tribal consultation risks
Narrow and administratively prescriptive but politically sensitive on environmental and permitting grounds; likely to face debate, amendmen…
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for CLEAN Act.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.