H.R. 1707 (119th)Bill Overview

Grown in America Act of 2025

Taxation|Taxation
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
Feb 27, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill creates a new business tax credit (section 45BB) to incentivize use of U.S.-produced agricultural commodities. The credit effectively provides up to 25% of a taxpayer’s domestic agricultural input costs (subject to a $100 million annual cap).

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize domestic jobs and supply-chain resilience

Watch point

Originates in House and appeals to agricultural constituencies, but fiscal cost and lack of offsets create moderate opposition.

This bill creates a new business tax credit (section 45BB) to incentivize use of U.S.-produced agricultural commodities.

The credit effectively provides up to 25% of a taxpayer’s domestic agricultural input costs (subject to a $100 million annual cap).

Starting in 2026 the bill phases in rising domestic sourcing thresholds (50% to 85%) that, if unmet, eliminate the credit for a taxpayer.

Passage35/100

Targeted, potentially popular with farm and manufacturing interests but large unscored fiscal exposure and trade concerns reduce enactment prospects.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention60/100

Liberals emphasize domestic jobs and supply-chain resilience

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
ManufacturersConsumers · Federal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreases demand for U.S.-produced agricultural commodities, potentially raising farm revenue.
  • Potential benefitMay encourage domestic sourcing and shorten supply chains, improving supply resilience.
  • ManufacturersCould support agricultural and related processing jobs if manufacturers buy more domestic inputs.
Likely burdened
  • ConsumersMay raise costs for food manufacturers if domestic inputs are more expensive, risking higher consumer prices.
  • Federal agenciesCould reduce federal revenue by subsidizing domestic input purchases, with unclear total fiscal cost.
  • Potential burdenComplex eligibility and sourcing calculations increase compliance and administrative burden for businesses and agencies.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize domestic jobs and supply-chain resilience
Progressive70%

Likely cautiously supportive: the credit promotes domestic farming, rural jobs, and supply-chain resilience.

They would worry about benefits flowing mainly to large processors and potential food price increases without safeguards.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Pragmatic but cautious: sees the bill as a targeted incentive to increase U.S. sourcing while noting implementation, fiscal cost, and trade consequences.

Would seek cost estimates, anti-fraud rules, clear definitions, and a sunset or review mechanism.

Split reaction
Conservative30%

Skeptical: supports farmers but worries the credit is protectionist, distorts markets, and creates government intervention in supply chains.

Concerned about fiscal cost and corporate welfare for large food firms.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Targeted, potentially popular with farm and manufacturing interests but large unscored fiscal exposure and trade concerns reduce enactment prospects.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No official cost estimate or fiscal score provided in text
  • Unknown level of industry support or opposition
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize domestic jobs and supply-chain resilience

Targeted, potentially popular with farm and manufacturing interests but large unscored fiscal exposure and trade concerns reduce enactment…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Grown in America Act of 2025.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis