- Potential benefitIncreases demand for U.S.-produced agricultural commodities, potentially raising farm revenue.
- Potential benefitMay encourage domestic sourcing and shorten supply chains, improving supply resilience.
- ManufacturersCould support agricultural and related processing jobs if manufacturers buy more domestic inputs.
Grown in America Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
This bill creates a new business tax credit (section 45BB) to incentivize use of U.S.-produced agricultural commodities. The credit effectively provides up to 25% of a taxpayer’s domestic agricultural input costs (subject to a $100 million annual cap).
Liberals emphasize domestic jobs and supply-chain resilience
Originates in House and appeals to agricultural constituencies, but fiscal cost and lack of offsets create moderate opposition.
This bill creates a new business tax credit (section 45BB) to incentivize use of U.S.-produced agricultural commodities.
The credit effectively provides up to 25% of a taxpayer’s domestic agricultural input costs (subject to a $100 million annual cap).
Starting in 2026 the bill phases in rising domestic sourcing thresholds (50% to 85%) that, if unmet, eliminate the credit for a taxpayer.
Targeted, potentially popular with farm and manufacturing interests but large unscored fiscal exposure and trade concerns reduce enactment prospects.
How solid the drafting looks.
Liberals emphasize domestic jobs and supply-chain resilience
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- ConsumersMay raise costs for food manufacturers if domestic inputs are more expensive, risking higher consumer prices.
- Federal agenciesCould reduce federal revenue by subsidizing domestic input purchases, with unclear total fiscal cost.
- Potential burdenComplex eligibility and sourcing calculations increase compliance and administrative burden for businesses and agencies.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Liberals emphasize domestic jobs and supply-chain resilience
Likely cautiously supportive: the credit promotes domestic farming, rural jobs, and supply-chain resilience.
They would worry about benefits flowing mainly to large processors and potential food price increases without safeguards.
Pragmatic but cautious: sees the bill as a targeted incentive to increase U.S. sourcing while noting implementation, fiscal cost, and trade consequences.
Would seek cost estimates, anti-fraud rules, clear definitions, and a sunset or review mechanism.
Skeptical: supports farmers but worries the credit is protectionist, distorts markets, and creates government intervention in supply chains.
Concerned about fiscal cost and corporate welfare for large food firms.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Targeted, potentially popular with farm and manufacturing interests but large unscored fiscal exposure and trade concerns reduce enactment prospects.
- No official cost estimate or fiscal score provided in text
- Unknown level of industry support or opposition
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Liberals emphasize domestic jobs and supply-chain resilience
Targeted, potentially popular with farm and manufacturing interests but large unscored fiscal exposure and trade concerns reduce enactment…
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Grown in America Act of 2025.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.