H.R. 1717 (119th)Bill Overview

Communications Security Act

Science, Technology, Communications|Broadcasting, cable, digital technologiesComputer security and identity theft
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 27, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

Requires the Federal Communications Commission to establish (or designate and modify) a council advising on communications networks' security, reliability, and interoperability.

The Chair appoints members for two-year terms, excluding entities the Chair publicly deems “not trusted.” The council must report every two years and its reports be posted publicly; the council is exempt from automatic advisory committee termination. “Not trusted” uses national-security criteria from the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019.

Passage60/100

Low-cost, technical advisory bill with limited regulatory impact typically advances; delegated exclusion authority to Chair is the main friction point.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention45/100

Scope of Chair discretion to label entities “not trusted”.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Local governmentsTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay produce coordinated recommendations improving communications networks' security and resilience.
  • Local governmentsCould increase federal, state, local, and Tribal coordination on communications policy and incident response.
  • Targeted stakeholdersBiennial public reports may improve transparency and inform industry and regulators.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersConcentrated appointment authority in the Chair may centralize influence over council composition and priorities.
  • Targeted stakeholdersExcluding entities labeled "not trusted" could remove relevant technical expertise or competitive vendors from discussi…
  • Targeted stakeholdersCouncil recommendations could prompt new FCC rules imposing compliance costs on carriers and vendors.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Scope of Chair discretion to label entities “not trusted”.
Progressive80%

Likely supportive because it advances network security and includes public-interest and government representatives.

Concerned about Chair authority to bar organizations and potential industry-dominated composition; wants transparency safeguards and civil-liberties protections.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Views the bill as a practical, low-cost advisory step to strengthen communications resilience.

Appreciates built-in expertise and public reporting but notes vague terms and centralization of exclusion authority; wants clearer membership rules and transparency.

Leans supportive
Conservative55%

Cautiously receptive because it prioritizes national-security protections and restricts entities tied to foreign adversaries.

Skeptical about creating a permanent advisory body and potential regulatory creep or politicization of exclusions by the FCC Chair.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood60/100

Low-cost, technical advisory bill with limited regulatory impact typically advances; delegated exclusion authority to Chair is the main friction point.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or staffing/funding language included
  • How Chair will apply "not trusted" standard in practice
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Scope of Chair discretion to label entities “not trusted”.

Low-cost, technical advisory bill with limited regulatory impact typically advances; delegated exclusion authority to Chair is the main fri…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Communications Security Act.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis