Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in eac…
Requires the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to issue guidance within one year obligating covered executive and independent agencies to annually submit information on "covered projects". Covered projects are projects more than five years behind schedule or with cost overruns of $1 billion or more versus the original estimate.
Liberal emphasizes risk of political weaponization against social programs
Technocratic oversight bill with broad appeal; likely low resistance in committee/House unless opposed by affected agencies/contractors.
Requires the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to issue guidance within one year obligating covered executive and independent agencies to annually submit information on "covered projects".
Covered projects are projects more than five years behind schedule or with cost overruns of $1 billion or more versus the original estimate.
Agencies must report descriptive details, original and current cost and completion dates (CPI-adjusted), scope changes, explanations for delays or cost growth, contractor identities, and any awards or bonuses.
Content is narrow, non‑controversial administrative transparency which historically can pass, but standalone bills often stall and defense/contractor concerns could slow action.
How solid the drafting looks.
Liberal emphasizes risk of political weaponization against social programs
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberal emphasizes risk of political weaponization against social programs
Likely supportive of greater transparency and accountability for large taxpayer-funded cost overruns.
Concerned reporting could be used politically to attack social programs or slow essential long-term investments.
Would expect follow-up actions to hold contractors and agencies accountable and to protect equity-serving projects.
Generally favorable toward standardized, public reporting to improve accountability and inform appropriations.
Worries about duplicative reporting requirements, administrative cost, and clarity of definitions.
Would seek coordination with GAO, DOD, and existing reporting to avoid burden and protect sensitive information.
Strongly supportive of measures that expose wasteful, overbudget government spending and enable tighter fiscal oversight.
Views annual public reports as a tool to pressure agencies and contractors to control costs.
Concerned about disclosure of classified or operationally sensitive defense program details and would prefer redaction or exemptions.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow, non‑controversial administrative transparency which historically can pass, but standalone bills often stall and defense/contractor concerns could slow action.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberal emphasizes risk of political weaponization against social programs
Content is narrow, non‑controversial administrative transparency which historically can pass, but standalone bills often stall and defense/…
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Billion Dollar Boondoggle Act of 2025.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.