H.R. 1763 (119th)Bill Overview

For the relief of Diego Montoya Bedoya.

domestic policy|Private Legislation
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 27, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for considerati…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This private bill would allow Diego Montoya Bedoya to apply for an immigrant visa or adjust to lawful permanent resident status despite normally applicable INA provisions. It waives grounds for removal or inadmissibility, directs rescission of any outstanding removal orders, requires filing within two years, reduces the country visa cap by one, and bars his parents, brothers, and sisters from receiving family-preference benefits.

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize humanitarian relief and correcting injustice

Watch point

Narrow, nonfiscal single-case bills often clear committee and floor under routine procedures, though some Members object to private bills.

This private bill would allow Diego Montoya Bedoya to apply for an immigrant visa or adjust to lawful permanent resident status despite normally applicable INA provisions.

It waives grounds for removal or inadmissibility, directs rescission of any outstanding removal orders, requires filing within two years, reduces the country visa cap by one, and bars his parents, brothers, and sisters from receiving family-preference benefits.

The bill also requires a PAYGO budgetary statement for compliance purposes.

Passage40/100

Content is narrow and low-cost, aiding House prospects, but customary Senate procedural obstacles and precedence concerns reduce overall chance.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention55/100

Liberals emphasize humanitarian relief and correcting injustice

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
WorkersImmigrants

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitProvides a pathway to lawful permanent residence for an individual otherwise barred under existing immigration law.
  • WorkersAllows the beneficiary to work lawfully, potentially increasing taxable earnings and labor market participation.
  • Potential benefitRescinding removal orders immediately ends deportation proceedings and stabilizes the beneficiary’s immigration status.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenCreates an exception to standard immigration processes, which critics may view as unequal treatment.
  • ImmigrantsReduces the annual immigrant visa allotment for the beneficiary’s birth country by one, affecting other applicants.
  • Potential burdenWaiving grounds for removal or inadmissibility could raise public‑safety or enforcement concerns depending on the recor…
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize humanitarian relief and correcting injustice
Progressive75%

Likely sympathetic to individualized relief for an immigrant, seeing this as correcting a hardship or injustice.

Concerned about lack of public case details and assurance this isn’t granting impunity for serious criminal conduct.

Leans supportive
Centrist50%

Views this as a narrowly targeted private relief measure that may be reasonable if well-justified.

Wants procedural transparency, fiscal accounting, and assurance it won’t undercut immigration law or public safety.

Split reaction
Conservative20%

Likely opposed because it carves out an exception to statutory immigration rules and waives inadmissibility and removal grounds.

Sees risk to rule of law and potential encouragement of case-by-case legislative interventions.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Content is narrow and low-cost, aiding House prospects, but customary Senate procedural obstacles and precedence concerns reduce overall chance.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No formal cost estimate included in bill text
  • Contents of DHS/State records cited are unknown
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize humanitarian relief and correcting injustice

Content is narrow and low-cost, aiding House prospects, but customary Senate procedural obstacles and precedence concerns reduce overall ch…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for For the relief of Diego Montoya Bedoya..

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis