H.R. 1825 (119th)Bill Overview

GRACE Act

Education|Education
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Mar 4, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill directs the Secretary of Education to eliminate the Office of Enforcement within the Office of Federal Student Aid, an office established by a Department electronic announcement on October 8, 2021. The text contains a single operative directive to dismantle that enforcement office.

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize borrower protections, conservatives emphasize reducing federal enforcement

Watch point

Narrow administrative bill can move quickly in a receptive chamber but risks opposition from consumer‑protection and higher‑education oversight advocates.

The bill directs the Secretary of Education to eliminate the Office of Enforcement within the Office of Federal Student Aid, an office established by a Department electronic announcement on October 8, 2021.

The text contains a single operative directive to dismantle that enforcement office.

Passage30/100

Very narrow deregulatory change with limited fiscal impact but politically sensitive; success depends heavily on chamber majorities and negotiation context.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention75/100

Liberals emphasize borrower protections, conservatives emphasize reducing federal enforcement

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesFederal agencies · Taxpayers

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesReduces federal regulatory presence over institutions receiving federal student aid.
  • Federal agenciesMay lower federal administrative costs tied to maintaining a separate enforcement office.
  • Potential benefitDecreases compliance burdens for some colleges and career or religious education providers.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesWeakens federal oversight of institutions participating in Title IV student aid programs.
  • Federal agenciesMay increase risk of fraud, predatory practices, or abuse of federal student aid funds.
  • TaxpayersCould raise taxpayer liabilities if reduced enforcement leads to higher defaults or fraud losses.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize borrower protections, conservatives emphasize reducing federal enforcement
Progressive10%

Likely views the bill negatively as a rollback of federal oversight protecting borrowers and students.

Sees elimination as reducing accountability for institutions that administer federal student aid.

Likely resistant
Centrist50%

Mixed view: appreciates concerns about bureaucracy but worries about reduced enforcement capacity.

Would seek clarity on how oversight and borrower protections are preserved or restructured.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Likely supportive as reducing federal enforcement aligns with goals of limiting bureaucracy and protecting religious and career education.

Sees removal as correcting executive overreach.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood30/100

Very narrow deregulatory change with limited fiscal impact but politically sensitive; success depends heavily on chamber majorities and negotiation context.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or staffing/funding implications provided
  • Legal/statutory basis of the Office of Enforcement unclear in text
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize borrower protections, conservatives emphasize reducing federal enforcement

Very narrow deregulatory change with limited fiscal impact but politically sensitive; success depends heavily on chamber majorities and neg…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for GRACE Act.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis