H.R. 1885 (119th)Bill Overview

Town of North Topsail Beach Coastal Barrier Resources System Map Amendment Act of 2025

Public Lands and Natural Resources|Marine and coastal resources, fisheriesNorth Carolina
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Mar 5, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Subcommittee Hearings Held

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to amend the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System map to remove from unit L06 any parcel inside the Town of North Topsail Beach that, as of enactment, is zoned for uses other than conservation.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize environmental and climate-resilience harms.

Watch point

Local, technical bills typically clear the House with low controversy; few policy tradeoffs here.

This bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to amend the John H.

Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System map to remove from unit L06 any parcel inside the Town of North Topsail Beach that, as of enactment, is zoned for uses other than conservation.

The Secretary must make the corrections within 30 days, and each excluded parcel is to be treated as meeting the statutory criteria in 16 U.S.C. 3503(g)(1)(B).

Passage65/100

Narrow, administratively implementable change with limited fiscal impact increases prospects, but environmental or insurance program concerns add uncertainty.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention70/100

Progressives emphasize environmental and climate-resilience harms.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesRestores eligibility for federal flood insurance and other federal financial assistance for excluded property owners.
  • Local governmentsCould increase local property values and property tax revenues by enabling development or rebuilding.
  • Federal agenciesReduces regulatory uncertainty by aligning federal maps with the town's existing zoning designations.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesMay increase federal exposure to flood insurance payouts and disaster assistance for newly eligible parcels.
  • Potential burdenCould encourage development in coastal hazard zones, raising future risks to people and property.
  • Potential burdenLikely reduces coastal habitat protections and may harm wildlife and natural storm buffers on excluded parcels.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize environmental and climate-resilience harms.
Progressive25%

Likely skeptical or opposed.

The persona will view the amendment as reducing coastal-protection constraints and potentially enabling development on barrier islands, raising environmental and climate-resilience concerns.

Likely resistant
Centrist65%

Cautiously favorable if limited and well-documented.

The persona will see this as a focused technical correction respecting local zoning, while wanting transparency on fiscal and environmental impacts.

Split reaction
Conservative90%

Likely supportive.

The persona will view the bill as restoring local control and property rights by removing municipal parcels from a federal restriction, and as a narrow, sensible map correction.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood65/100

Narrow, administratively implementable change with limited fiscal impact increases prospects, but environmental or insurance program concerns add uncertainty.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Absent Congressional Budget Office cost estimate
  • Local government and community support level
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize environmental and climate-resilience harms.

Narrow, administratively implementable change with limited fiscal impact increases prospects, but environmental or insurance program concer…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Town of North Topsail Beach Coastal Barrier Resources System M…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis