H.R. 1919 (119th)Bill Overview

Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act

Finance and Financial Sector|Bank accounts, deposits, capitalComputers and information technology
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Mar 6, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill amends the Federal Reserve Act to bar Federal Reserve Banks from offering financial products or accounts directly to individuals and to prohibit them from issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) or similar digital asset, either directly or indirectly through intermediaries.

It also forbids the Board of Governors from testing, studying, developing, creating, or implementing a CBDC, and bars use of a CBDC for monetary policy.

The bill defines CBDC as a digital, Fed-liability currency denominated in the national unit and widely available to the public, and includes an exception for private, open, permissionless, privacy-preserving dollar-denominated currencies.

Passage35/100

Content is narrow and low-cost (helps House chances) but it centrally constrains the Fed, creating institutional and policy resistance in the Senate and from stakeholders.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention65/100

Scope of Fed powers: conservatives favor strict ban; centrists worry about lost tools.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersLimits potential government surveillance through a centrally issued, widely available digital currency.
  • Targeted stakeholdersPrevents direct Fed competition with retail banks, which could protect bank deposits and associated jobs.
  • Targeted stakeholdersReduces the risk of new regulatory obligations tied directly to a central retail payment instrument.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay impede modernization of the national payments system and related efficiency gains.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould limit options for financial inclusion if a CBDC would have served unbanked or underserved populations.
  • Targeted stakeholdersRestricts a potential monetary policy or crisis‑response tool that some economists argue could be useful.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Scope of Fed powers: conservatives favor strict ban; centrists worry about lost tools.
Progressive60%

Likely supportive of privacy protections and skepticism about government surveillance via a Fed-run digital currency, but cautious about a broad ban on Fed research and tools that could promote financial inclusion.

Concerned that the bill's exception for private, permissionless currencies may favor unregulated crypto over consumer protections.

May prefer preserving privacy while ensuring consumer safeguards and inclusion.

Split reaction
Centrist50%

Views the bill as a reasonable check on central banking power and government surveillance, but worries the blanket prohibitions are blunt and could reduce policy options or disrupt payments innovation.

Prefers narrowly tailored restrictions, clear definitions, and periodic reviews to balance privacy, stability, and law enforcement needs.

Split reaction
Conservative90%

Likely strongly supportive because the bill limits federal power, blocks potential government surveillance, and prevents the Fed from issuing a CBDC.

Sees the bill as protecting individual liberty, privacy, and market-based alternatives to state-run digital currency.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Reached or meaningfully advanced

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Content is narrow and low-cost (helps House chances) but it centrally constrains the Fed, creating institutional and policy resistance in the Senate and from stakeholders.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Senate willingness to take up legislation restricting the Fed
  • Federal Reserve and financial sector lobbying response
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Scope of Fed powers: conservatives favor strict ban; centrists worry about lost tools.

Content is narrow and low-cost (helps House chances) but it centrally constrains the Fed, creating institutional and policy resistance in t…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis