H.R. 1986 (119th)Bill Overview

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 620 East Pecan Boulevard in McAllen, Texas, as the "Agent Raul H. Gonzalez Jr. Memorial Post Office Building".

Government Operations and Politics|Congressional tributesGovernment buildings, facilities, and property
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
Mar 10, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill names the United States Postal Service facility at 620 East Pecan Boulevard in McAllen, Texas, the "Agent Raul H. Gonzalez Jr.

Why people may split

Priority debate: symbolic naming versus substantive policy work

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward and well-formed commemorative designation: it clearly identifies the facility and the name to be applied and includes the customary references clause.

This bill names the United States Postal Service facility at 620 East Pecan Boulevard in McAllen, Texas, the "Agent Raul H.

Gonzalez Jr.

Memorial Post Office Building." It also states that any federal reference to that facility will use the new name.

Passage85/100

Ceremonial single-site renaming with negligible fiscal impact and low controversy historically succeeds, though procedural objections or delays remain possible.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward and well-formed commemorative designation: it clearly identifies the facility and the name to be applied and includes the customary references clause.

Contention8/100

Priority debate: symbolic naming versus substantive policy work

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · Local governmentsTaxpayers · Federal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesProvides formal federal recognition and memorialization of Agent Raul H. Gonzalez Jr.
  • Local governmentsMay increase local community pride and recognition for the honoree and family.
  • Potential benefitCould modestly increase visitation or civic ceremonies at the renamed facility.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenConsumes congressional time and resources for a largely symbolic naming measure.
  • TaxpayersImposes small, nonzero costs for new signage and records updates on USPS or taxpayers.
  • Federal agenciesAdds to the number of federally named facilities, which some view as dilutive.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Priority debate: symbolic naming versus substantive policy work
Progressive80%

Generally supportive of honoring public servants and community figures, but conscious of legislative priorities.

May prefer attention to substantive policy over symbolic namings unless the honoree represents shared values.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Views the bill as a routine, noncontroversial naming of a federal building reflecting local input.

Sees it as appropriate use of congressional authority if constituents support it.

Leans supportive
Conservative95%

Likely strongly supportive, especially if Agent Gonzalez served in law enforcement or military.

Values honoring service, local recognition, and modest federal action.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood85/100

Ceremonial single-site renaming with negligible fiscal impact and low controversy historically succeeds, though procedural objections or delays remain possible.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Potential procedural hold in the Senate
  • Timing and prioritization in committee
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Priority debate: symbolic naming versus substantive policy work

Ceremonial single-site renaming with negligible fiscal impact and low controversy historically succeeds, though procedural objections or de…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward and well-formed commemorative designation: it clearly identifies the facility and the name to be applied and includes the customary references cl…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis