Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
Requires the Secretary of Agriculture to produce an annual assessment for House and Senate Agriculture Committees on U.S. dependency on critical agricultural products or inputs from the People’s Republic of China. The report must analyze domestic production capacity, identify current and potential supply‑chain bottlenecks, and recommend mitigation strategies and legislative or regulatory actions to onshore or nearshore production.
Left worries about environmental and labor safeguards in onshoring plans
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-scoped reporting requirement with clear purpose, designated responsibility, and substantive content requirements, and it includes several protections for proprietary information.
Requires the Secretary of Agriculture to produce an annual assessment for House and Senate Agriculture Committees on U.S. dependency on critical agricultural products or inputs from the People’s Republic of China.
The report must analyze domestic production capacity, identify current and potential supply‑chain bottlenecks, and recommend mitigation strategies and legislative or regulatory actions to onshore or nearshore production.
Specified critical inputs include equipment, fuel, fertilizers, feed components, veterinary drugs/vaccines, crop protection chemicals, seed, and other inputs determined by the Secretary.
Low‑cost, administrative reporting on supply‑chain risks related to China is broadly palatable; absent funding and potential procedural obstacles introduce uncertainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-scoped reporting requirement with clear purpose, designated responsibility, and substantive content requirements, and it includes several protections for proprietary information. However, it omits several implementation and resourcing details that would normally accompany an ongoing, comprehensive annual assessment.
Left worries about environmental and labor safeguards in onshoring plans
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Left worries about environmental and labor safeguards in onshoring plans
Generally supportive of assessing and reducing dependence on authoritarian suppliers to protect food security and workers.
Wants the assessment to include environmental, labor, and small‑farm impacts and to avoid subsidizing large agribusiness without safeguards.
Cautious about securitizing agriculture in a way that fuels protectionism.
Sees the bill as a pragmatic, bipartisan oversight tool to identify agricultural supply vulnerabilities.
Supports the voluntary and confidentiality provisions but wants clear metrics, cost estimates, and implementation timelines.
Cautious about unintended trade escalation or unfunded mandates.
Favors reducing strategic dependence on China and supports an assessment focused on national security and supply‑chain resilience.
Approves confidentiality and voluntary data collection.
Wary of expanding bureaucracy or binding mandates; prefers nonbinding, market‑friendly solutions.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low‑cost, administrative reporting on supply‑chain risks related to China is broadly palatable; absent funding and potential procedural obstacles introduce uncertainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Left worries about environmental and labor safeguards in onshoring plans
Low‑cost, administrative reporting on supply‑chain risks related to China is broadly palatable; absent funding and potential procedural obs…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-scoped reporting requirement with clear purpose, designated responsibility, and substantive content requirements, and it includes several protections for pr…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.