Generally supports congressional oversight and transparency, but is wary this bill could hinder diplomacy and limit executive flexibility in negotiations with Iran.

Concerned delays or political vetoes could undercut efforts to reduce nuclear risks or secure detainee releases.

Would examine whether the review process preserves necessary classified briefing channels.

Sees the bill as a reasonable checks-and-balances mechanism that provides congressional input on major sanctions changes.

However, worries about rigid timelines and procedural hurdles delaying urgent foreign‑policy decisions.

Would favor adjustments to preserve executive agility for clear emergencies while keeping oversight strong.

Likely to welcome the bill as strengthening Congress’s authority to prevent unilateral executive rollback of Iran sanctions.

Views the measure as a tool to block or slow any administration attempts to lift sanctions without congressional consent.

Supportive of procedural mechanisms that make relief harder without clear legislative approval.