- Federal agenciesIncreases federal funding options to help small retailers purchase security hardware and panic systems.
- Potential benefitMay reduce theft and assaults by improving incident detection and deterrence at covered businesses.
- Potential benefitLowers immediate capital burden on business owners by subsidizing installation costs.
BODEGA Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to add an allowable use for Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (Byrne-JAG) funds: installation of panic buttons and surveillance equipment in private businesses. It also explicitly makes private businesses classified under NAICS 445131 eligible for those funds.
Progressives stress worker safety and civil-rights safeguards
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory amendment that is precise in its textual integration with existing law but sparse in implementation, fiscal, definitional, and oversight detail.
Amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to add an allowable use for Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (Byrne-JAG) funds: installation of panic buttons and surveillance equipment in private businesses.
It also explicitly makes private businesses classified under NAICS 445131 eligible for those funds.
Modest chance: narrow and non-ideological but many introduced bills stall; implementation and oversight concerns could slow progress.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory amendment that is precise in its textual integration with existing law but sparse in implementation, fiscal, definitional, and oversight detail.
Progressives stress worker safety and civil-rights safeguards
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Potential burdenExpands surveillance infrastructure, raising privacy and civil liberties concerns in affected communities.
- Potential burdenCreates ongoing maintenance and data storage costs that grants may not cover long term.
- Potential burdenRisks misuse or excessive retention of camera footage without stronger oversight measures.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Progressives stress worker safety and civil-rights safeguards
Likely supportive of funding to protect workers and small business owners in high-crime neighborhoods, but concerned about surveillance and civil liberties.
Would press for privacy safeguards, data limits, and community oversight before full endorsement.
Pragmatically inclined to support a narrow expansion that helps small businesses deter crime, provided there are checks on misuse and clear oversight.
Wants evaluation, reporting, and limited scope to prevent mission creep.
Mixed to somewhat opposed: appreciates protecting small businesses and discouraging crime, but wary of federal funding for private security and expanded surveillance.
Prefers state/local control or tax incentives instead of federal grant expansion.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Modest chance: narrow and non-ideological but many introduced bills stall; implementation and oversight concerns could slow progress.
- No cost estimate or impact on current Byrne-JAG allocations provided
- Mechanism for state/local pass-through to private businesses unclear
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Progressives stress worker safety and civil-rights safeguards
Modest chance: narrow and non-ideological but many introduced bills stall; implementation and oversight concerns could slow progress.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory amendment that is precise in its textual integration with existing law but sparse in implementation, fiscal, definitional, and oversig…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.