H.R. 2018 (119th)Bill Overview

BODEGA Act of 2025

Crime and Law Enforcement|Crime and Law Enforcement
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Mar 10, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

Amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to add an allowable use for Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (Byrne-JAG) funds: installation of panic buttons and surveillance equipment in private businesses. It also explicitly makes private businesses classified under NAICS 445131 eligible for those funds.

Why people may split

Progressives stress worker safety and civil-rights safeguards

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory amendment that is precise in its textual integration with existing law but sparse in implementation, fiscal, definitional, and oversight detail.

Amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to add an allowable use for Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (Byrne-JAG) funds: installation of panic buttons and surveillance equipment in private businesses.

It also explicitly makes private businesses classified under NAICS 445131 eligible for those funds.

Passage35/100

Modest chance: narrow and non-ideological but many introduced bills stall; implementation and oversight concerns could slow progress.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory amendment that is precise in its textual integration with existing law but sparse in implementation, fiscal, definitional, and oversight detail.

Contention50/100

Progressives stress worker safety and civil-rights safeguards

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesIncreases federal funding options to help small retailers purchase security hardware and panic systems.
  • Potential benefitMay reduce theft and assaults by improving incident detection and deterrence at covered businesses.
  • Potential benefitLowers immediate capital burden on business owners by subsidizing installation costs.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenExpands surveillance infrastructure, raising privacy and civil liberties concerns in affected communities.
  • Potential burdenCreates ongoing maintenance and data storage costs that grants may not cover long term.
  • Potential burdenRisks misuse or excessive retention of camera footage without stronger oversight measures.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives stress worker safety and civil-rights safeguards
Progressive70%

Likely supportive of funding to protect workers and small business owners in high-crime neighborhoods, but concerned about surveillance and civil liberties.

Would press for privacy safeguards, data limits, and community oversight before full endorsement.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Pragmatically inclined to support a narrow expansion that helps small businesses deter crime, provided there are checks on misuse and clear oversight.

Wants evaluation, reporting, and limited scope to prevent mission creep.

Leans supportive
Conservative40%

Mixed to somewhat opposed: appreciates protecting small businesses and discouraging crime, but wary of federal funding for private security and expanded surveillance.

Prefers state/local control or tax incentives instead of federal grant expansion.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Modest chance: narrow and non-ideological but many introduced bills stall; implementation and oversight concerns could slow progress.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or impact on current Byrne-JAG allocations provided
  • Mechanism for state/local pass-through to private businesses unclear
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives stress worker safety and civil-rights safeguards

Modest chance: narrow and non-ideological but many introduced bills stall; implementation and oversight concerns could slow progress.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory amendment that is precise in its textual integration with existing law but sparse in implementation, fiscal, definitional, and oversig…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis