Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Requires the FTC to issue rules within 360 days forcing covered commercial websites and online services (excluding small businesses) to publish a truthful, machine‑readable short-form terms-of-service summary, a graphic data‑flow diagram, and an interactive tagged full terms of service. The summary must list categories of sensitive information, required versus optional data, user legal liabilities, deletion directions, recent breach history, reading time, and change logs.
Privacy/transparency benefits versus regulatory compliance burden
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes substantive new regulatory obligations with reasonably clear high-level mechanics and statutory integration, but delegates substantial technical detail to the Federal Trade Commission and omits fiscal and some implementation specifics.
Requires the FTC to issue rules within 360 days forcing covered commercial websites and online services (excluding small businesses) to publish a truthful, machine‑readable short-form terms-of-service summary, a graphic data‑flow diagram, and an interactive tagged full terms of service.
The summary must list categories of sensitive information, required versus optional data, user legal liabilities, deletion directions, recent breach history, reading time, and change logs.
The FTC will enforce violations as unfair or deceptive acts, with state attorneys general able to bring parens patriae suits; the law does not create new contractual obligations.
Technocratic consumer-protection aims improve prospects, but broad applicability, industry resistance, and enforcement implications lower overall chances.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes substantive new regulatory obligations with reasonably clear high-level mechanics and statutory integration, but delegates substantial technical detail to the Federal Trade Commission and omits fiscal and some implementation specifics.
Privacy/transparency benefits versus regulatory compliance burden
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Privacy/transparency benefits versus regulatory compliance burden
Likely supportive because the bill increases transparency, accessibility, and consumer control over personal data.
It aligns with priorities on privacy, informed consent, and protections for vulnerable populations, though advocates may want stronger user rights.
Generally favorable toward clearer, standardized disclosures that reduce information asymmetry, but cautious about implementation costs and unintended burdens.
Will look for measured rulemaking, clear standards, and a reasonable compliance timeline.
Skeptical due to expanded regulatory mandates, potential for costly compliance, and broader enforcement by FTC and state attorneys general.
Prefers voluntary transparency or narrower federal rules limiting litigation exposure.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technocratic consumer-protection aims improve prospects, but broad applicability, industry resistance, and enforcement implications lower overall chances.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Privacy/transparency benefits versus regulatory compliance burden
Technocratic consumer-protection aims improve prospects, but broad applicability, industry resistance, and enforcement implications lower o…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes substantive new regulatory obligations with reasonably clear high-level mechanics and statutory integration, but delegates substantial technical detail to…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.