Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Creates a federal Commission to study relocating non‑security federal agencies out of the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. The Commission, composed of senior federal officials and cabinet heads, must report to Congress within one year and recommend transfers using criteria including local cost of living, infrastructure and land availability, relevant regional industries, and prior telework participation.
Progressives emphasize workforce equity and mission continuity concerns
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a commission with a clear purpose, defined membership, consideration factors, and a one-year reporting deadline.
Creates a federal Commission to study relocating non‑security federal agencies out of the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.
The Commission, composed of senior federal officials and cabinet heads, must report to Congress within one year and recommend transfers using criteria including local cost of living, infrastructure and land availability, relevant regional industries, and prior telework participation.
Modest chance: low-cost, narrowly tailored study increases viability, but political optics, stakeholder opposition, and Senate procedural hurdles reduce odds.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a commission with a clear purpose, defined membership, consideration factors, and a one-year reporting deadline. It is moderately precise about who participates and what to study but omits several standard structural and resourcing provisions that would support robust, timely execution.
Progressives emphasize workforce equity and mission continuity concerns
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize workforce equity and mission continuity concerns
Skeptical of a relocation push; sees potential economic development benefits but worries about worker impacts and equity.
Concerned relocation could harm diversity, collective bargaining, and mission continuity, or be used to hollow out the federal civil service in favor of political aims.
Views the bill as a reasonable, limited step: a study rather than an immediate relocation.
Wants balanced analysis of costs, operational impacts, and workforce retention before any action; emphasizes measurable metrics and fiscal accountability.
Generally favorable; sees decentralizing the bureaucracy as fiscally prudent and politically desirable.
Supports studying relocation to lower-cost regions and boosting heartland economies while reducing DC-centric influence.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Modest chance: low-cost, narrowly tailored study increases viability, but political optics, stakeholder opposition, and Senate procedural hurdles reduce odds.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize workforce equity and mission continuity concerns
Modest chance: low-cost, narrowly tailored study increases viability, but political optics, stakeholder opposition, and Senate procedural h…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a commission with a clear purpose, defined membership, consideration factors, and a one-year reporting deadline. It is moderately precise about who partic…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.