H.R. 2037 (119th)Bill Overview

Open RAN Outreach Act

Science, Technology, Communications|Government information and archivesScience, Technology, Communications
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Mar 11, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The Open RAN Outreach Act directs the Assistant Secretary of Commerce (through the Office of Internet Connectivity and Growth) to conduct outreach and provide technical assistance to small communications network providers about Open RAN and other open network architectures. The outreach must raise awareness of uses, benefits, and challenges of Open RAN and explain participation in the Wireless Supply Chain Innovation Grant Program under section 9202(a)(1) of the FY2021 NDAA.

Why people may split

Degree of federal involvement and resource needs

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill imposes a narrowly defined administrative duty on a named Commerce official and provides basic definitions, but it lacks necessary operational detail on funding, timelines, methods, and oversight.

The Open RAN Outreach Act directs the Assistant Secretary of Commerce (through the Office of Internet Connectivity and Growth) to conduct outreach and provide technical assistance to small communications network providers about Open RAN and other open network architectures.

The outreach must raise awareness of uses, benefits, and challenges of Open RAN and explain participation in the Wireless Supply Chain Innovation Grant Program under section 9202(a)(1) of the FY2021 NDAA.

The bill defines "Assistant Secretary," "open network architecture," and "Open RAN network."

Passage70/100

Technocratic, narrow measure with low fiscal impact and broad potential support; passage most likely unless procedural hurdles or substantive amendments arise.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill imposes a narrowly defined administrative duty on a named Commerce official and provides basic definitions, but it lacks necessary operational detail on funding, timelines, methods, and oversight.

Contention15/100

Degree of federal involvement and resource needs

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreased awareness may lead small providers to consider deploying Open RAN architectures.
  • Potential benefitGreater outreach could increase small providers' participation in the Wireless Supply Chain Innovation Grant Program.
  • Potential benefitGreater vendor competition could lower equipment costs and reduce supplier concentration in wireless networks.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenNo explicit funding authorization could strain Commerce resources required for outreach activities.
  • Potential burdenCapital and operational costs of Open RAN adoption may burden small providers despite assistance.
  • Potential burdenOpen RAN deployments may introduce interoperability and cybersecurity risks requiring mitigation.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Degree of federal involvement and resource needs
Progressive85%

Likely supportive: it aids small, often rural or minority-owned providers and promotes competition and interoperable networks.

They will view outreach as a modest federal role to diversify supply chains and lower barriers to entry.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally favorable but pragmatic: supports technical assistance that increases competition and efficient use of grants, while wanting clarity on costs and implementation.

Will want measurable goals and accountability for federal outreach.

Leans supportive
Conservative60%

Cautiously receptive: the bill is limited and administrative, but may raise concerns about expanded federal involvement and potential regulatory encouragement of specific technologies.

Will scrutinize costs and federal overreach.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood70/100

Technocratic, narrow measure with low fiscal impact and broad potential support; passage most likely unless procedural hurdles or substantive amendments arise.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No explicit appropriation or funding authorization in the text
  • Potential industry stakeholders may seek amendments
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Degree of federal involvement and resource needs

Technocratic, narrow measure with low fiscal impact and broad potential support; passage most likely unless procedural hurdles or substanti…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill imposes a narrowly defined administrative duty on a named Commerce official and provides basic definitions, but it lacks necessary operational detail on funding, time…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis