Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
The ACRES Act requires the Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior to include an annual, publicly available report in the President’s budget showing the number of federal acres where hazardous fuels reduction activities were completed. Reports must avoid double-counting acres, specify WUI location, wildfire risk levels, activity types, cost per acre, region, and effectiveness.
Libs emphasize ecological safeguards and funding; conservatives emphasize accountability and no new spending.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is an administrative/operational measure that is generally well-structured for imposing reporting and data-standardization requirements on the Departments of Agriculture and Interior.
The ACRES Act requires the Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior to include an annual, publicly available report in the President’s budget showing the number of federal acres where hazardous fuels reduction activities were completed.
Reports must avoid double-counting acres, specify WUI location, wildfire risk levels, activity types, cost per acre, region, and effectiveness.
The bill mandates standardized tracking procedures within 90 days, a short congressional report describing procedures, and a GAO study within two years.
Technocratic, low-cost reporting bill has realistic path but still must clear Senate committee and receive floor time; implementation detail concerns could slow progress.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is an administrative/operational measure that is generally well-structured for imposing reporting and data-standardization requirements on the Departments of Agriculture and Interior. It provides specific reporting elements, responsible actors, deadlines, public disclosure, and GAO review.
Libs emphasize ecological safeguards and funding; conservatives emphasize accountability and no new spending.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Libs emphasize ecological safeguards and funding; conservatives emphasize accountability and no new spending.
Generally positive about better data, transparency, and measuring effectiveness of wildfire-risk work, but concerned funding and safeguards are missing.
Likely to support the principle of accountability while pushing for environmental protections and more resources.
Worried standardized metrics could prioritize cheap, ecologically harmful treatments if not designed carefully.
Favors clearer, standardized reporting and accountability but cautious about administrative feasibility and costs.
Will support if implementation is realistic and does not impose large unfunded burdens.
Wants clear definitions and timelines to ensure useful, comparable data.
Likely supportive because the bill increases accountability, measures cost-effectiveness, and requires no new spending.
Sees useful oversight of federal land management activities and cost-per-acre metrics for better fiscal discipline.
May caution against overly prescriptive federal standards that limit on-the-ground flexibility.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technocratic, low-cost reporting bill has realistic path but still must clear Senate committee and receive floor time; implementation detail concerns could slow progress.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Libs emphasize ecological safeguards and funding; conservatives emphasize accountability and no new spending.
Technocratic, low-cost reporting bill has realistic path but still must clear Senate committee and receive floor time; implementation detai…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is an administrative/operational measure that is generally well-structured for imposing reporting and data-standardization requirements on the Departments of Agricult…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.