Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
The bill creates a new HHS grant program to fund up to 10 primary care offices to hire clinical social workers to screen for self-harm and suicide, provide short-term prevention services, and refer patients for longer-term care. Grants are limited to $500,000 for two years (renewable), require development of screening standards within 180 days, quarterly reporting from grantees, and biennial program reports to Congress with CDC and NIMH input.
Scale: liberals want far more grants and funding; conservatives accept smaller, state-led options
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a narrowly scoped substantive grant program with clear core elements (purpose, implementing authority, allowable activities, grant limits, timelines, and reporting) but omits several common and practical implementation details—most notably funding authorization, applicant selection criteria, and specificity on workforce qualifications and data/privacy safeguards.
The bill creates a new HHS grant program to fund up to 10 primary care offices to hire clinical social workers to screen for self-harm and suicide, provide short-term prevention services, and refer patients for longer-term care.
Grants are limited to $500,000 for two years (renewable), require development of screening standards within 180 days, quarterly reporting from grantees, and biennial program reports to Congress with CDC and NIMH input.
Targeted, low-cost suicide-prevention pilot with reporting and stakeholder consultation makes enactment plausible absent competing priorities.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a narrowly scoped substantive grant program with clear core elements (purpose, implementing authority, allowable activities, grant limits, timelines, and reporting) but omits several common and practical implementation details—most notably funding authorization, applicant selection criteria, and specificity on workforce qualifications and data/privacy safeguards.
Scale: liberals want far more grants and funding; conservatives accept smaller, state-led options
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Scale: liberals want far more grants and funding; conservatives accept smaller, state-led options
Likely broadly supportive because it expands access to mental-health interventions in primary care and funds workforce capacity.
Would view it as a positive, targeted federal investment but insufficient in scale and scope for national need.
Cautiously positive as a modest, evidence-generating pilot that strengthens primary care screening and referral.
Will emphasize measurable outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and minimal administrative burden before broader rollout.
Skeptical about expanding federal grant programs despite supporting suicide prevention goals; concerned about federal standard-setting, spending, and potential overreach into clinical practice.
Might favor state-led or private solutions instead.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Targeted, low-cost suicide-prevention pilot with reporting and stakeholder consultation makes enactment plausible absent competing priorities.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Scale: liberals want far more grants and funding; conservatives accept smaller, state-led options
Targeted, low-cost suicide-prevention pilot with reporting and stakeholder consultation makes enactment plausible absent competing prioriti…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a narrowly scoped substantive grant program with clear core elements (purpose, implementing authority, allowable activities, grant limits, timelines, and…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.