Subcommittee Hearings Held
The bill bars use of federal funds to allow, lead to, or study breaching or functionally altering the four Lower Snake River dams, including studies of power, flood control, or navigation replacements and dam-removal technical assistance. It also forbids spillage operations at those dams unless approved jointly by the Secretary of the Army and the Bonneville Power Administration Administrator, who must consider Columbia River System operations.
Progressives emphasize lost opportunities for salmon recovery studies
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes clear, narrow substantive prohibitions and assigns responsible agencies, but it includes limited procedural detail, no fiscal analysis or appropriations language, scant treatment of exceptions or emergencies, and minimal oversight or accountability provisions.
The bill bars use of federal funds to allow, lead to, or study breaching or functionally altering the four Lower Snake River dams, including studies of power, flood control, or navigation replacements and dam-removal technical assistance.
It also forbids spillage operations at those dams unless approved jointly by the Secretary of the Army and the Bonneville Power Administration Administrator, who must consider Columbia River System operations.
The dams are defined as Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite in Washington.
Content is narrow and administratively clear, aiding House prospects, but Senate obstacles and stakeholder controversy reduce overall likelihood.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes clear, narrow substantive prohibitions and assigns responsible agencies, but it includes limited procedural detail, no fiscal analysis or appropriations language, scant treatment of exceptions or emergencies, and minimal oversight or accountability provisions.
Progressives emphasize lost opportunities for salmon recovery studies
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize lost opportunities for salmon recovery studies
Likely opposes the bill because it forecloses scientific study and options for restoring salmon runs and river ecosystems.
Sees the funding ban and spillage restrictions as limiting environmental management and tribal remedy options.
Cautious and mixed: supports protecting critical infrastructure until evidence justifies change, but worries a blanket prohibition on studies and assistance is imprudent.
Would favor procedural safeguards and independent analyses.
Likely supports the bill as a protection of hydropower, navigation, and local economies, and as a check on efforts to remove or alter dams.
Views spillage limits as restraining operations that harm power reliability.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow and administratively clear, aiding House prospects, but Senate obstacles and stakeholder controversy reduce overall likelihood.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize lost opportunities for salmon recovery studies
Content is narrow and administratively clear, aiding House prospects, but Senate obstacles and stakeholder controversy reduce overall likel…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes clear, narrow substantive prohibitions and assigns responsible agencies, but it includes limited procedural detail, no fiscal analysis or appropriations l…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.