H.R. 2089 (119th)Bill Overview

Generating Retirement Ownership through Long-Term Holding

Taxation|Taxation
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Mar 11, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill creates a new Internal Revenue Code section (1046) allowing individuals to defer recognition of capital gain dividends from regulated investment companies when those dividends are automatically reinvested under a dividend reinvestment plan. Deferred gain is recognized proportionally when the taxpayer later sells or redeems shares, and any unrecovered deferred gain is recognized and included in income at the taxpayer’s death.

Why people may split

Distributional impact: liberals worry benefits flow to wealthy investors

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive change to the Internal Revenue Code that clearly defines a nonrecognition rule for reinvested capital gain dividends and includes necessary conforming amendments, but it delegates significant operational detail to Treasury regulations and omits fiscal/reporting specifics.

This bill creates a new Internal Revenue Code section (1046) allowing individuals to defer recognition of capital gain dividends from regulated investment companies when those dividends are automatically reinvested under a dividend reinvestment plan.

Deferred gain is recognized proportionally when the taxpayer later sells or redeems shares, and any unrecovered deferred gain is recognized and included in income at the taxpayer’s death.

Shares acquired by reinvestment receive a holding period of more than one year and one day for holding-period purposes.

Passage40/100

Technically narrow and administrable with bipartisan appeal, but potential revenue impact and legislative scheduling reduce standalone chances.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive change to the Internal Revenue Code that clearly defines a nonrecognition rule for reinvested capital gain dividends and includes necessary conforming amendments, but it delegates significant operational detail to Treasury regulations and omits fiscal/reporting specifics.

Contention35/100

Distributional impact: liberals worry benefits flow to wealthy investors

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitEncourages long-term holding by allowing deferral of tax on reinvested capital gain dividends until sale or death.
  • Potential benefitIncreases after-tax returns for individual shareholders by deferring tax on reinvested capital gain dividends.
  • Potential benefitReduces immediate cash needs for tax payments on reinvested distributions, improving investor liquidity.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesDefers federal tax receipts, reducing near-term revenue available to the Treasury.
  • Potential burdenRequires new recordkeeping to track unrecognized gain across reinvested shares, increasing administrative burden.
  • Potential burdenGives larger benefits to long‑term, higher‑balance investors, raising distributional fairness concerns.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Distributional impact: liberals worry benefits flow to wealthy investors
Progressive60%

Likely cautiously supportive of incentives for long-term ownership but concerned about distributional effects and revenue loss.

Sees benefit to retirement-oriented saving but worries the primary gains accrue to wealthier investors and mutual fund holders.

Wants offsets, anti-abuse safeguards, and reporting requirements to ensure fairness.

Split reaction
Centrist55%

A pragmatic, split view: recognizes the policy goal of encouraging long-term investment but wary of revenue loss and administrative complexity.

Would seek a CBO cost estimate, clear regulations, and possibly a time-limited or targeted approach as compromise.

Split reaction
Conservative75%

Generally favorable because it defers taxation and promotes investment and retirement ownership.

Views it as pro-investor tax relief, though some conservatives may object to any added complexity or to the provision forcing recognition at death rather than preserving broader estate step-up.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Technically narrow and administrable with bipartisan appeal, but potential revenue impact and legislative scheduling reduce standalone chances.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Magnitude and timing of federal revenue impact (CBO/score absent)
  • Distributional benefits — which income groups primarily benefit
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Distributional impact: liberals worry benefits flow to wealthy investors

Technically narrow and administrable with bipartisan appeal, but potential revenue impact and legislative scheduling reduce standalone chan…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive change to the Internal Revenue Code that clearly defines a nonrecognition rule for reinvested capital gain dividends and includes necessary conformin…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis