Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
The bill amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to set fixed NPDES permit terms: up to 10 years for permits issued to a State or municipality and up to 5 years for permits issued to other persons. It also makes a set of technical corrections to statutory subsection cross-references.
Liberals emphasize environmental risk from less frequent permit updates
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill makes a clear and specific substantive amendment to the Clean Water Act by prescribing maximum fixed NPDES permit terms and attempts technical corrections to related statutory text.
The bill amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to set fixed NPDES permit terms: up to 10 years for permits issued to a State or municipality and up to 5 years for permits issued to other persons.
It also makes a set of technical corrections to statutory subsection cross-references.
No other substantive changes to permit standards or enforcement are included in the text provided.
A narrow, low-cost administrative tweak with potential stakeholder opposition; passage more plausible if folded into broader legislation or negotiated.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill makes a clear and specific substantive amendment to the Clean Water Act by prescribing maximum fixed NPDES permit terms and attempts technical corrections to related statutory text. The principal statutory change is specified concretely, but the bill omits several common implementation details.
Liberals emphasize environmental risk from less frequent permit updates
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize environmental risk from less frequent permit updates
Likely skeptical.
Supports efficiency for local governments but worries longer permit terms could delay stronger pollution limits and public review.
Would want safeguards to protect water quality and ensure timely updates for new science or pollutants.
Cautiously favorable to efficiency gains but concerned about maintaining environmental safeguards.
Views the bill as a reasonable administrative tweak if paired with mechanisms for interim review and enforcement reopeners.
Generally supportive.
Views longer municipal permit terms as reducing federal workload, cutting red tape, and increasing predictability for local governments.
Sees technical corrections as housekeeping without policy impact.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
A narrow, low-cost administrative tweak with potential stakeholder opposition; passage more plausible if folded into broader legislation or negotiated.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize environmental risk from less frequent permit updates
A narrow, low-cost administrative tweak with potential stakeholder opposition; passage more plausible if folded into broader legislation or…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill makes a clear and specific substantive amendment to the Clean Water Act by prescribing maximum fixed NPDES permit terms and attempts technical corrections to related…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.