Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
The National STEM Week Act directs the National Science and Technology Foundation Committee on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (CoSTEM) to designate an annual National STEM Week. During that week CoSTEM will encourage participation by educational institutions, families, and industry partners, and promote mentorship, site visits, and support for STEM activities.
Liberals emphasize funding and equity; conservatives emphasize voluntary private partnerships.
Relative to its intended legislative type (a reporting/designation measure with commemorative elements), this bill clearly establishes a national observance, assigns responsibility to CoSTEM, and requires annual reporting to Congress.
The National STEM Week Act directs the National Science and Technology Foundation Committee on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (CoSTEM) to designate an annual National STEM Week.
During that week CoSTEM will encourage participation by educational institutions, families, and industry partners, and promote mentorship, site visits, and support for STEM activities.
CoSTEM must report annually to Congress on participation, impact on STEM education gaps, and recommendations for improvement.
Low-cost, narrow, bipartisan-friendly education initiative typically clears Congress, though timing and procedural hurdles remain.
Relative to its intended legislative type (a reporting/designation measure with commemorative elements), this bill clearly establishes a national observance, assigns responsibility to CoSTEM, and requires annual reporting to Congress. It combines symbolic designation with light administrative duties and a reporting obligation.
Liberals emphasize funding and equity; conservatives emphasize voluntary private partnerships.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize funding and equity; conservatives emphasize voluntary private partnerships.
Likely broadly supportive of the goal to increase STEM access and diversity, especially for underserved communities.
Concerned that the bill contains no dedicated funding and that industry partnerships could influence curricula or prioritize commercial interests.
Would want stronger equity safeguards and targeted resources to ensure meaningful benefits to low-income and rural students.
Generally favorable to a national awareness week that encourages public-private partnerships and measurable evaluation.
Sees benefits in coordination and reporting but wants clarity on costs, administrative burden, and evidence of effectiveness.
Would support the bill if CoSTEM uses the reporting to show outcomes and if implementation avoids unfunded mandates.
Likely supportive of promoting STEM and workforce readiness while valuing private-sector engagement.
Prefers the bill because it primarily encourages voluntary collaboration and lacks new mandates or appropriations.
Some may want stronger local control language and guardrails against federal overreach.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low-cost, narrow, bipartisan-friendly education initiative typically clears Congress, though timing and procedural hurdles remain.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize funding and equity; conservatives emphasize voluntary private partnerships.
Low-cost, narrow, bipartisan-friendly education initiative typically clears Congress, though timing and procedural hurdles remain.
Relative to its intended legislative type (a reporting/designation measure with commemorative elements), this bill clearly establishes a national observance, assigns responsibility to CoSTEM, and requires annual reporti…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.