H.R. 2119 (119th)Bill Overview

St. Patrick’s Day Act

Arts, Culture, Religion|Arts, Culture, Religion
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Mar 14, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends 5 U.S.C. §6103(a) to add St. Patrick’s Day as a Federal holiday, inserting it after Washington’s Birthday.

Why people may split

Religious origins vs secular cultural recognition concerns

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped substantive change with clear statutory drafting for insertion into the list of federal holidays but limited accompanying detail.

This bill amends 5 U.S.C. §6103(a) to add St.

Patrick’s Day as a Federal holiday, inserting it after Washington’s Birthday.

The text only designates the day as a Federal holiday; no additional implementation details or offsets are included.

Passage40/100

Narrow and administratively simple but incurs measurable federal cost and lacks compromise features; outcome sensitive to bipartisan appetite.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped substantive change with clear statutory drafting for insertion into the list of federal holidays but limited accompanying detail.

Contention55/100

Religious origins vs secular cultural recognition concerns

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · ConsumersFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesFederal employees would receive a paid federal holiday on St. Patrick's Day.
  • Federal agenciesFederal offices and many federal services, including courts, would typically be closed that day.
  • ConsumersRetail, hospitality, and tourism sectors could see increased consumer activity and revenues around March 17.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesAdditional paid holiday increases federal payroll costs and overtime for essential staffing.
  • Federal agenciesClosures could delay federal services, permitting actions, or court proceedings on that date.
  • Federal agenciesPrivate employers may face higher leave or overtime costs if they mirror federal closure.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Religious origins vs secular cultural recognition concerns
Progressive70%

Likely cautiously supportive as recognition of Irish-American heritage and cultural diversity.

Would note church/state concerns and opportunity costs, and want a clearly secular framing and attention to equity.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Will evaluate pragmatically: understands symbolic value and bipartisan appeal, but worries about fiscal and service impacts.

Supportive if costs are quantified and administrative effects minimized.

Split reaction
Conservative25%

Likely opposed or skeptical because it expands federal holidays, increases government-paid time off, and broadens federal cultural recognition.

Concerned about cost and federal overreach.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Narrow and administratively simple but incurs measurable federal cost and lacks compromise features; outcome sensitive to bipartisan appetite.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No Congressional Budget Office cost estimate included
  • Potential objections framing it as a religious holiday
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Religious origins vs secular cultural recognition concerns

Narrow and administratively simple but incurs measurable federal cost and lacks compromise features; outcome sensitive to bipartisan appeti…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped substantive change with clear statutory drafting for insertion into the list of federal holidays but limited accompanying detail.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis