Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Creates an EPA pilot grant program — the Recycling Infrastructure and Accessibility Program — to fund projects improving recycling access, especially in underserved communities. Grants (competitive) of $500,000–$15,000,000 are authorized at $30 million per year (FY2025–2029).
Disagreement over adequacy of funding and long-term sustainability
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill appropriately creates and funds a pilot grant program through the EPA with clear definitions, stated goals, eligibility rules, funding levels, and a reporting requirement.
Creates an EPA pilot grant program — the Recycling Infrastructure and Accessibility Program — to fund projects improving recycling access, especially in underserved communities.
Grants (competitive) of $500,000–$15,000,000 are authorized at $30 million per year (FY2025–2029).
Eligible entities include states, local governments, tribes, and public-private partnerships; funds may be used for transfer stations, curbside expansion, and PPPs but not for recycling education.
Narrow, low-cost infrastructure pilot with clear benefits increases prospects; final outcome depends on appropriations and standard floor procedures.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill appropriately creates and funds a pilot grant program through the EPA with clear definitions, stated goals, eligibility rules, funding levels, and a reporting requirement. It provides adequate high-level structure for a congressional authorization while delegating significant procedural detail to the Administrator.
Disagreement over adequacy of funding and long-term sustainability
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Disagreement over adequacy of funding and long-term sustainability
Generally supportive: improves recycling access in underserved communities and directs most funds to those areas.
Likely disappointed funding scale is modest and education is barred, but sees environmental justice value.
Cautiously favorable: pragmatic federal support for localized infrastructure gaps, with competitive grants and cost-sharing.
Wants clearer performance metrics, oversight, and cost estimates.
Skeptical: wary of a new federal grant program and recurring appropriations.
May accept local control and PPP elements but opposes high federal cost-share and targeted set-asides.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, low-cost infrastructure pilot with clear benefits increases prospects; final outcome depends on appropriations and standard floor procedures.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Disagreement over adequacy of funding and long-term sustainability
Narrow, low-cost infrastructure pilot with clear benefits increases prospects; final outcome depends on appropriations and standard floor p…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill appropriately creates and funds a pilot grant program through the EPA with clear definitions, stated goals, eligibility rules, funding levels, and a reporting require…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.