H.R. 2164 (119th)Bill Overview

Dayton National Cemetery Expansion Act of 2025

Armed Forces and National Security|Armed Forces and National Security
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Mar 14, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill authorizes the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to begin an agreement to accept a transfer of approximately 58 acres of land from the Montgomery County Land Bank near Dayton National Cemetery. The land would be transferred at no cost, and the Secretary must accept and use the parcel as a national cemetery within three years of the Land Bank's offer.

Why people may split

Liberals worry about community use and environmental cleanup

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused administrative authorization that clearly identifies the parties, the parcel, and basic timelines for a land transfer to expand Dayton National Cemetery.

This bill authorizes the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to begin an agreement to accept a transfer of approximately 58 acres of land from the Montgomery County Land Bank near Dayton National Cemetery.

The land would be transferred at no cost, and the Secretary must accept and use the parcel as a national cemetery within three years of the Land Bank's offer.

The provision applies only to the specifically described parcel and only to the Montgomery County Land Bank.

Passage70/100

Narrow, non-controversial conveyance for a veterans' cemetery with no new spending is historically likely to clear Congress, subject to procedural steps.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused administrative authorization that clearly identifies the parties, the parcel, and basic timelines for a land transfer to expand Dayton National Cemetery. It provides sufficient high-level direction for an operational act but leaves out procedural, fiscal, and legal-detail elements commonly relevant to property transfers and site conversions.

Contention15/100

Liberals worry about community use and environmental cleanup

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
FamiliesLocal governments · Federal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • FamiliesIncreases burial capacity near Dayton National Cemetery for veterans and eligible family members.
  • Potential benefitAvoids purchase costs by transferring land to the VA at no monetary consideration.
  • Potential benefitPreserves contiguous acreage for cemetery use, simplifying site planning and operations.
Likely burdened
  • Local governmentsRemoves taxable property from the local tax base, potentially reducing municipal revenues.
  • Federal agenciesCreates ongoing federal maintenance and operational costs for the VA without explicit funding.
  • Local governmentsPrecludes alternative local development uses, such as housing or commercial projects, on the parcel.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals worry about community use and environmental cleanup
Progressive80%

Generally favorable because it expands burial access for veterans and uses public land for a public purpose.

Likely to want assurances about community consultation, environmental cleanup, and long‑term maintenance funding before full support.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Pragmatic and broadly supportive given low acquisition cost and clear public purpose.

Wants basic fiscal and logistical details, such as cost estimates, environmental review, and coordination with local authorities.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Likely supportive because it serves veterans, involves a free transfer, and leverages a local-state partnership.

May caution about new federal responsibilities and ongoing fiscal liabilities.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood70/100

Narrow, non-controversial conveyance for a veterans' cemetery with no new spending is historically likely to clear Congress, subject to procedural steps.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate for developing or maintaining expanded cemetery
  • Potential environmental/cleanup liabilities on the parcel
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals worry about community use and environmental cleanup

Narrow, non-controversial conveyance for a veterans' cemetery with no new spending is historically likely to clear Congress, subject to pro…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused administrative authorization that clearly identifies the parties, the parcel, and basic timelines for a land transfer to expand Dayton National…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis