H.R. 2177 (119th)Bill Overview

Tradeable Energy Performance Standards Act

Energy|Energy
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Mar 18, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill amends the Clean Air Act to create a tradeable energy performance standard (TEPS) for large electricity generators, cogeneration, and large thermal energy users beginning in 2028. Covered facilities must surrender one emission allowance per metric ton of CO2 emitted annually; the EPA will distribute output-based allowances each year and permit trading, bilateral purchase agreements, and alternative compliance payments.

Why people may split

Liberals focus on environmental ambition and equity; conservatives focus on federal overreach.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified substantive policy change that establishes a comprehensive statutory framework for a tradeable energy performance standard, with detailed definitions, allocation and target formulas, trading rules, an offset grant program, market integrity provisions, and reporting requirements.

The bill amends the Clean Air Act to create a tradeable energy performance standard (TEPS) for large electricity generators, cogeneration, and large thermal energy users beginning in 2028.

Covered facilities must surrender one emission allowance per metric ton of CO2 emitted annually; the EPA will distribute output-based allowances each year and permit trading, bilateral purchase agreements, and alternative compliance payments.

Payments and penalties feed a Carbon Mitigation Fund to finance verified offset and mitigation projects; EPA must establish tracking, market rules, sequestration standards, and issue final regulations within 24 months.

Passage20/100

Comprehensive federal climate market is high-impact and politically salient; technical compromises exist but content likely triggers strong opposition making enactment unlikely absent major changes.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified substantive policy change that establishes a comprehensive statutory framework for a tradeable energy performance standard, with detailed definitions, allocation and target formulas, trading rules, an offset grant program, market integrity provisions, and reporting requirements.

Contention65/100

Liberals focus on environmental ambition and equity; conservatives focus on federal overreach.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedConsumers

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitCreates a declining, output-based standard that financially rewards lower emissions intensity per unit of output.
  • Potential benefitAllows trading and bilateral contracts, providing flexibility to reduce compliance costs across operators.
  • Potential benefitEstablishes a Carbon Mitigation Fund to finance energy efficiency, electrification, grid upgrades, and sequestration pr…
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenImposes new compliance costs on covered facilities, potentially increasing operating expenses for affected generators a…
  • ConsumersMay raise electricity or thermal energy prices for consumers if generators pass through compliance costs.
  • Potential burdenCreates administrative and regulatory complexity requiring new monitoring, tracking, and enforcement systems at EPA and…
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals focus on environmental ambition and equity; conservatives focus on federal overreach.
Progressive65%

Generally supportive of an economy-wide emissions-reduction tool, but concerned about generosity of free allowance distribution and offset integrity.

Will press for stronger accountability, community reinvestment, worker protections, and that revenues benefit affected, disadvantaged communities.

Views bilateral purchase agreements skeptically if they prolong fossil fuel use.

Split reaction
Centrist70%

Cautiously positive about a market-based, output-focused approach that sets predictable declining standards.

Values the bill's built-in flexibility (trading, ACPs, offsets) but wants clarity on costs, regulatory details, and impact on reliability and consumers.

Will watch EPA rulemaking and GAO reviews before stronger endorsement.

Leans supportive
Conservative25%

Likely opposed overall due to new federal mandates, regulatory expansion, and market intervention.

Views the allowance distribution and EPA authority as intrusive, and questions economic impacts and property-rights limits.

Might favor voluntary or state-led approaches instead.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood20/100

Comprehensive federal climate market is high-impact and politically salient; technical compromises exist but content likely triggers strong opposition making enactment unlikely absent major changes.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
86%
Complexityhigh
Why this could stall
  • Projected economic impacts and industry lobbying responses
  • Whether EPA cost and implementation estimates accompany the bill
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals focus on environmental ambition and equity; conservatives focus on federal overreach.

Comprehensive federal climate market is high-impact and politically salient; technical compromises exist but content likely triggers strong…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified substantive policy change that establishes a comprehensive statutory framework for a tradeable energy performance standard, with detailed definiti…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis