Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
The bill bars the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) from initiating or implementing reductions in force or involuntary separations until full-year FY2026 appropriations for NIST are enacted. Exceptions allow involuntary separations only for cause (misconduct, delinquency, or inefficiency).
Lib-left prioritizes worker protection and research continuity
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, narrowly scoped administrative measure that clearly prohibits reductions in force at NIST until a defined appropriations event.
The bill bars the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) from initiating or implementing reductions in force or involuntary separations until full-year FY2026 appropriations for NIST are enacted.
Exceptions allow involuntary separations only for cause (misconduct, delinquency, or inefficiency).
It references Title 5 definitions and clarifies the prohibition is additional to other adverse personnel authorities.
Content is narrow and noncontroversial but low legislative priority; success likely only if attached to larger appropriations/omnibus vehicle.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, narrowly scoped administrative measure that clearly prohibits reductions in force at NIST until a defined appropriations event. It references relevant title 5 definitions and preserves existing adverse action authority.
Lib-left prioritizes worker protection and research continuity
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Lib-left prioritizes worker protection and research continuity
Likely supportive.
Sees the moratorium as protecting federal research workers, preserving institutional knowledge, and preventing disruptive layoffs during funding uncertainty.
Views protections for career civil servants as aligning with fair labor and program continuity goals.
Cautiously favorable but pragmatic.
Appreciates workforce stability and program continuity, yet worries the moratorium could constrain management flexibility and fiscal responsibility.
Would favor reporting, narrow exceptions, and sunset provisions to balance protection and accountability.
Likely opposed.
Views the moratorium as an unnecessary restriction on agency management, potentially preserving underperforming staff and increasing costs.
Prefers management discretion, fiscal offsets, and stronger accountability mechanisms instead of a broad hiring/separation prohibition.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow and noncontroversial but low legislative priority; success likely only if attached to larger appropriations/omnibus vehicle.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Lib-left prioritizes worker protection and research continuity
Content is narrow and noncontroversial but low legislative priority; success likely only if attached to larger appropriations/omnibus vehic…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, narrowly scoped administrative measure that clearly prohibits reductions in force at NIST until a defined appropriations event. It references relevant t…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.