Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 22 - 0.
This bill amends the Homeland Security Act to require all DHS components that are members of the DHS Intelligence Enterprise to participate in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s (ODNI) Intelligence Community Civilian Joint Duty Program, following ODNI-established program policies.
Progressives emphasize civil liberties safeguards; conservatives emphasize preserving operational autonomy.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise administrative directive that amends the Homeland Security Act to require DHS components in the DHS Intelligence Enterprise to participate in the ODNI Civilian Joint Duty Program in accordance with DNI policy.
This bill amends the Homeland Security Act to require all DHS components that are members of the DHS Intelligence Enterprise to participate in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s (ODNI) Intelligence Community Civilian Joint Duty Program, following ODNI-established program policies.
Very narrow, administrative alignment with an existing program and limited fiscal impact make enactment reasonably likely, absent procedural or agency objections.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise administrative directive that amends the Homeland Security Act to require DHS components in the DHS Intelligence Enterprise to participate in the ODNI Civilian Joint Duty Program in accordance with DNI policy.
Progressives emphasize civil liberties safeguards; conservatives emphasize preserving operational autonomy.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize civil liberties safeguards; conservatives emphasize preserving operational autonomy.
Generally supportive of stronger civilian intelligence career paths and interagency coordination, but cautious about civil liberties and domestic law enforcement implications.
Will look for explicit safeguards, oversight, and transparency in implementation.
Pragmatically favorable: a narrow, administrative alignment to ODNI policy that can improve coordination and workforce flexibility.
Wants clear cost estimates, phased implementation, and measurable outcomes before full rollout.
Mixed: values stronger intelligence support for security and law enforcement, but wary of expanding ODNI authority and added federal mandates.
Prefers preserving component autonomy and limiting new bureaucracy.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Very narrow, administrative alignment with an existing program and limited fiscal impact make enactment reasonably likely, absent procedural or agency objections.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize civil liberties safeguards; conservatives emphasize preserving operational autonomy.
Very narrow, administrative alignment with an existing program and limited fiscal impact make enactment reasonably likely, absent procedura…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise administrative directive that amends the Homeland Security Act to require DHS components in the DHS Intelligence Enterprise to participate in the ODNI Ci…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.