H.R. 2217 (119th)Bill Overview

Down East Remembrance Act

Public Lands and Natural Resources|AccidentsAviation and airports
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
Mar 18, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill designates six specific creeks in Carteret County, North Carolina, by name, each tied to coordinates, to honor individuals who died in a February 13, 2022 plane crash. It requires that any federal reference to those creeks use the new names.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes family/community consent and symbolism

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, well-specified commemorative naming statute.

This bill designates six specific creeks in Carteret County, North Carolina, by name, each tied to coordinates, to honor individuals who died in a February 13, 2022 plane crash.

It requires that any federal reference to those creeks use the new names.

The measure is commemorative and contains no regulatory or funding provisions.

Passage75/100

Narrow, symbolic naming bills historically have high enactment rates absent local objections or competing legislative priorities.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, well-specified commemorative naming statute. It provides precise coordinates and explicit name designations and includes a clause to govern references in federal materials, which are the primary legal requirements for such a measure.

Contention10/100

Liberal emphasizes family/community consent and symbolism

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLocal governments · Federal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesCreates formal federal recognition and memorialization honoring the crash victims.
  • Federal agenciesPromotes consistency by directing federal maps and records to use the new creek names.
  • Federal agenciesLikely imposes minimal direct fiscal cost on the federal government for the naming action.
Likely burdened
  • Local governmentsUses federal legislative action for local geographic naming, potentially bypassing state naming processes.
  • Federal agenciesRequires updates to federal maps, databases, and documents, creating small administrative costs.
  • Local governmentsMay shift costs for new signs or maintenance to local or state authorities.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes family/community consent and symbolism
Progressive85%

Generally favorable: views the bill as a respectful, symbolic act recognizing loss and supporting community healing.

Sees limited policy impact and appreciates federal acknowledgment of local tragedies.

May want assurances that families and local communities support the names.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Likely supportive as a low‑cost, noncontroversial commemorative action with minimal policy consequences.

Views it as reasonable constituent service and geographic housekeeping.

Wants clear interagency coordination to update maps and records efficiently.

Leans supportive
Conservative95%

Strongly supportive as a respectful, local memorial that imposes negligible federal costs.

Values honoring citizens and preserving local history.

May note minor concerns about precedent but accepts modest commemorative measures when locally requested.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood75/100

Narrow, symbolic naming bills historically have high enactment rates absent local objections or competing legislative priorities.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or implementation plan included
  • Potential overlap with state or local naming authorities
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes family/community consent and symbolism

Narrow, symbolic naming bills historically have high enactment rates absent local objections or competing legislative priorities.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, well-specified commemorative naming statute. It provides precise coordinates and explicit name designations and includes a clause to govern refe…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis