Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
The bill amends the Agricultural Act of 2014 to (1) require 100% indemnity payments for livestock attacks by Mexican gray wolves, and (2) direct the Secretary of Agriculture to provide annual emergency relief to producers whose herds are adversely affected by Mexican gray wolves. The Secretary must develop a formula within 180 days to allocate relief, considering herd size, state-level depredation rates, increased management costs, reduced birth rates, and producers' prevention practices.
Conservation vs property-rights emphasis over wolf recovery
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly amends existing statutory authorities to provide enhanced indemnity and to create an emergency relief mechanism for producers affected by Mexican gray wolves, with named implementing actors and some procedural deadlines and reporting requirements.
The bill amends the Agricultural Act of 2014 to (1) require 100% indemnity payments for livestock attacks by Mexican gray wolves, and (2) direct the Secretary of Agriculture to provide annual emergency relief to producers whose herds are adversely affected by Mexican gray wolves.
The Secretary must develop a formula within 180 days to allocate relief, considering herd size, state-level depredation rates, increased management costs, reduced birth rates, and producers' prevention practices.
The bill requires consultation with FSA, APHIS, and USFWS and annual reporting to congressional agriculture committees on relief distributed and recipients.
Narrow, administrable change with clear constituency support but contentious conservation implications and added cost reduce overall prospects.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly amends existing statutory authorities to provide enhanced indemnity and to create an emergency relief mechanism for producers affected by Mexican gray wolves, with named implementing actors and some procedural deadlines and reporting requirements.
Conservation vs property-rights emphasis over wolf recovery
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Conservation vs property-rights emphasis over wolf recovery
Likely supportive of providing financial protection to small producers, but concerned about implications for Mexican gray wolf conservation.
Would emphasize tying payments to strong prevention practices and safeguards to avoid undermining endangered-species recovery.
Pragmatic view: the bill addresses a clear hardship for livestock producers while building in data-driven allocation and agency consultation.
Support depends on transparent formula, cost control, and timely implementation.
Generally favorable: protects private property and compensates livestock owners fully for predator losses.
Viewed as correcting an imbalance that places undue burden on producers because of wildlife management decisions.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, administrable change with clear constituency support but contentious conservation implications and added cost reduce overall prospects.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Conservation vs property-rights emphasis over wolf recovery
Narrow, administrable change with clear constituency support but contentious conservation implications and added cost reduce overall prospe…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly amends existing statutory authorities to provide enhanced indemnity and to create an emergency relief mechanism for producers affected by Mexican gray wolves,…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.