Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
The bill amends the National Labor Relations Act to require that representation by a labor organization be based on a majority selection in a secret ballot election conducted by the National Labor Relations Board. It prohibits employers and unions from recognizing or bargaining with a representative not selected in a Board-conducted secret ballot, adds a Board-run decertification election mechanism, excludes preexisting recognition relationships, and requires the NLRB to revise regulations within six months.
Progressives see bill as restricting card-check; conservatives see it as protecting secret ballots
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly framed substantive amendment to the National Labor Relations Act that specifies new prohibitions and requirements by directly amending statutory text and directing the National Labor Relations Board to update regulations within a defined timeframe.
The bill amends the National Labor Relations Act to require that representation by a labor organization be based on a majority selection in a secret ballot election conducted by the National Labor Relations Board.
It prohibits employers and unions from recognizing or bargaining with a representative not selected in a Board-conducted secret ballot, adds a Board-run decertification election mechanism, excludes preexisting recognition relationships, and requires the NLRB to revise regulations within six months.
Targeted but highly contentious reform of union-recognition procedures; organized-labor opposition and Senate hurdles reduce enactment odds.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly framed substantive amendment to the National Labor Relations Act that specifies new prohibitions and requirements by directly amending statutory text and directing the National Labor Relations Board to update regulations within a defined timeframe.
Progressives see bill as restricting card-check; conservatives see it as protecting secret ballots
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives see bill as restricting card-check; conservatives see it as protecting secret ballots
Likely critical.
While affirming the value of secret ballots, this persona would view the bill as a restriction on card-check or voluntary recognition and a barrier to union organizing.
Concern centers on empowering employers to delay or complicate worker-led organizing campaigns.
Mixed view.
Supports the principle of secret ballot elections but worries the mandate could create administrative burdens and unintended obstacles to collective bargaining.
Would seek clearer implementation rules and timelines to limit delay and litigation.
Generally favorable.
Views the bill as protecting individual employee choice and preventing recognition absent a Board-supervised secret ballot.
Sees it as a check on union tactics like card-check and as restoring a neutral election process.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Targeted but highly contentious reform of union-recognition procedures; organized-labor opposition and Senate hurdles reduce enactment odds.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives see bill as restricting card-check; conservatives see it as protecting secret ballots
Targeted but highly contentious reform of union-recognition procedures; organized-labor opposition and Senate hurdles reduce enactment odds.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly framed substantive amendment to the National Labor Relations Act that specifies new prohibitions and requirements by directly amending statutory…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.