H.R. 2246 (119th)Bill Overview

Foreign Investment Guardrails to Help Thwart (FIGHT) China Act

International Affairs|International Affairs
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
Mar 21, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for c…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill (FIGHT China Act) authorizes Treasury-based sanctions on certain Chinese persons and entities identified as engaging in defense or surveillance sectors. It amends the Defense Production Act to prohibit or require notification for U.S. persons' investments in defined "prohibited" and "notifiable" technologies tied to a "country of concern" (the PRC, Hong Kong, Macau).

Why people may split

Degree of tolerance for executive sanctions authority and secrecy

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed substantive policy statute that establishes new prohibitions, enforcement authorities, and regulatory obligations concerning investments and certain technologies linked to a specified foreign jurisdiction.

The bill (FIGHT China Act) authorizes Treasury-based sanctions on certain Chinese persons and entities identified as engaging in defense or surveillance sectors.

It amends the Defense Production Act to prohibit or require notification for U.S. persons' investments in defined "prohibited" and "notifiable" technologies tied to a "country of concern" (the PRC, Hong Kong, Macau).

The bill creates reporting, confidentiality, waiver, and enforcement mechanisms, directs multilateral coordination, establishes a possible public database of covered foreign persons, and mandates divestment rules for U.S. holdings of entities on the Non-SDN Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies List.

Passage35/100

Ambitious, high-impact measures increase scrutiny from industry, allies, and lawmakers; narrow technical parts help but overall passage faces significant hurdles.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed substantive policy statute that establishes new prohibitions, enforcement authorities, and regulatory obligations concerning investments and certain technologies linked to a specified foreign jurisdiction. It provides substantial definitional detail, integrates with existing statutory authorities, and supplies funding, staffing authority, and reporting requirements to support implementation.

Contention48/100

Degree of tolerance for executive sanctions authority and secrecy

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitProvides stronger legal tools to block technology flows to Chinese military or surveillance programs.
  • Potential benefitCould incentivize domestic production investment in advanced semiconductors, AI, quantum, and related sectors.
  • Potential benefitCreates centralized reporting and databases that may clarify risk for investors and policymakers.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenImposes new compliance costs and regulatory burdens on financial institutions and investors.
  • Potential burdenMay force divestments that disrupt portfolios, pensions, and capital markets tied to targeted securities.
  • Federal agenciesExpands federal authority over private cross‑border investment, potentially creating legal and jurisdictional disputes.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Degree of tolerance for executive sanctions authority and secrecy
Progressive80%

Generally supportive of strong limits on transfers of sensitive military, surveillance, and advanced technology to the PRC to protect rights and global security.

Concerned about overbroad executive authority, secrecy, and economic harms to workers and supply-chain resilience.

Wants transparency, labor and humanitarian impact assessments, and safeguards for civil liberties and due process.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Cautious support: views bill as a plausible, targeted national security tool but stresses the need for clear regulations, predictable implementation, and cost-benefit analysis.

Wants narrowly tailored rules, stakeholder engagement, and safeguards against unintended economic disruption.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Broadly supportive of robust measures to block Chinese military and surveillance access to advanced U.S. technologies and finance.

Favors strong enforcement, sanctions, and investment restrictions, while urging rapid implementation and multilateral pressure.

Cautions against unnecessary domestic regulatory expansion.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Ambitious, high-impact measures increase scrutiny from industry, allies, and lawmakers; narrow technical parts help but overall passage faces significant hurdles.

Scope and complexity
86%
Scopesweeping
86%
Complexityhigh
Why this could stall
  • Anticipated private-sector lobbying strength and opposition
  • Degree of bipartisan alignment on China investment controls
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Degree of tolerance for executive sanctions authority and secrecy

Ambitious, high-impact measures increase scrutiny from industry, allies, and lawmakers; narrow technical parts help but overall passage fac…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed substantive policy statute that establishes new prohibitions, enforcement authorities, and regulatory obligations concerning investments and certain tec…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis