H.R. 2273 (119th)Bill Overview

UPRISERS Act

Immigration|Immigration
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Mar 21, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill requires the Secretary of State to revoke visas issued under INA section 101(a)(15)(F), (J), or (M) for nonimmigrant students and exchange/ vocational program participants who are convicted of assaulting a police officer or rioting-related offenses. It also amends INA 237(a)(2) to make such visa holders deportable following convictions for those same offenses, including incitement, organizing, participating in, or aiding and abetting a riot.

Why people may split

Whether definitions of 'rioting' are overly broad versus appropriately punitive

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and narrowly scoped substantive amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act that specifies new grounds for visa revocation and deportability for certain nonimmigrant categories upon conviction of assaulting a police officer or riot-related offenses.

The bill requires the Secretary of State to revoke visas issued under INA section 101(a)(15)(F), (J), or (M) for nonimmigrant students and exchange/ vocational program participants who are convicted of assaulting a police officer or rioting-related offenses.

It also amends INA 237(a)(2) to make such visa holders deportable following convictions for those same offenses, including incitement, organizing, participating in, or aiding and abetting a riot.

Passage40/100

Narrow, enforceable change favors passage in a chamber prioritizing immigration enforcement, but mandatory language, civil‑liberties concerns, and Senate hurdles lower overall odds.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and narrowly scoped substantive amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act that specifies new grounds for visa revocation and deportability for certain nonimmigrant categories upon conviction of assaulting a police officer or riot-related offenses. It references the correct statutory locations for amendment and enumerates illustrative offense types.

Contention70/100

Whether definitions of 'rioting' are overly broad versus appropriately punitive

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
StudentsStudents · States

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitSupporters could argue it removes noncitizen violent offenders, enhancing public safety.
  • StudentsIt may deter some international students from participating in violent protests.
  • Potential benefitThe bill reinforces immigration-based consequences for criminal convictions, aligning criminal and immigration enforcem…
Likely burdened
  • StudentsCritics could say it chills free speech and peaceful assembly by international students.
  • StatesBroad or variable state rioting statutes may produce deportations for lower‑level or ambiguous offenses.
  • Potential burdenIt raises due process and legal fairness concerns about visa revocation and expedited removal.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Whether definitions of 'rioting' are overly broad versus appropriately punitive
Progressive15%

Likely strongly concerned about civil liberties and potential overbreadth.

Views the bill as a punitive immigration response to protest activity that may sweep in nonviolent expression or political speech.

Likely resistant
Centrist50%

Mix of support for punishing violence and concern for civil liberties and clarity.

Favors targeted enforcement against violent offenders but wants precise definitions and procedural safeguards to avoid unintended consequences.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Likely supportive as a law-and-order measure that enforces visa compliance and removes foreigners who commit violent offenses.

Views revocation and deportability as appropriate consequences for assaulting police or rioting.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Narrow, enforceable change favors passage in a chamber prioritizing immigration enforcement, but mandatory language, civil‑liberties concerns, and Senate hurdles lower overall odds.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • How courts might treat mandatory visa‑revocation and deportation
  • Precise definitions and applicability to misdemeanor vs felony charges
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Whether definitions of 'rioting' are overly broad versus appropriately punitive

Narrow, enforceable change favors passage in a chamber prioritizing immigration enforcement, but mandatory language, civil‑liberties concer…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and narrowly scoped substantive amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act that specifies new grounds for visa revocation and deportability for certa…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis