- Potential benefitSupporters could argue it removes noncitizen violent offenders, enhancing public safety.
- StudentsIt may deter some international students from participating in violent protests.
- Potential benefitThe bill reinforces immigration-based consequences for criminal convictions, aligning criminal and immigration enforcem…
UPRISERS Act
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
The bill requires the Secretary of State to revoke visas issued under INA section 101(a)(15)(F), (J), or (M) for nonimmigrant students and exchange/ vocational program participants who are convicted of assaulting a police officer or rioting-related offenses. It also amends INA 237(a)(2) to make such visa holders deportable following convictions for those same offenses, including incitement, organizing, participating in, or aiding and abetting a riot.
Whether definitions of 'rioting' are overly broad versus appropriately punitive
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and narrowly scoped substantive amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act that specifies new grounds for visa revocation and deportability for certain nonimmigrant categories upon conviction of assaulting a police officer or riot-related offenses.
The bill requires the Secretary of State to revoke visas issued under INA section 101(a)(15)(F), (J), or (M) for nonimmigrant students and exchange/ vocational program participants who are convicted of assaulting a police officer or rioting-related offenses.
It also amends INA 237(a)(2) to make such visa holders deportable following convictions for those same offenses, including incitement, organizing, participating in, or aiding and abetting a riot.
Narrow, enforceable change favors passage in a chamber prioritizing immigration enforcement, but mandatory language, civil‑liberties concerns, and Senate hurdles lower overall odds.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and narrowly scoped substantive amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act that specifies new grounds for visa revocation and deportability for certain nonimmigrant categories upon conviction of assaulting a police officer or riot-related offenses. It references the correct statutory locations for amendment and enumerates illustrative offense types.
Whether definitions of 'rioting' are overly broad versus appropriately punitive
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- StudentsCritics could say it chills free speech and peaceful assembly by international students.
- StatesBroad or variable state rioting statutes may produce deportations for lower‑level or ambiguous offenses.
- Potential burdenIt raises due process and legal fairness concerns about visa revocation and expedited removal.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Whether definitions of 'rioting' are overly broad versus appropriately punitive
Likely strongly concerned about civil liberties and potential overbreadth.
Views the bill as a punitive immigration response to protest activity that may sweep in nonviolent expression or political speech.
Mix of support for punishing violence and concern for civil liberties and clarity.
Favors targeted enforcement against violent offenders but wants precise definitions and procedural safeguards to avoid unintended consequences.
Likely supportive as a law-and-order measure that enforces visa compliance and removes foreigners who commit violent offenses.
Views revocation and deportability as appropriate consequences for assaulting police or rioting.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, enforceable change favors passage in a chamber prioritizing immigration enforcement, but mandatory language, civil‑liberties concerns, and Senate hurdles lower overall odds.
- How courts might treat mandatory visa‑revocation and deportation
- Precise definitions and applicability to misdemeanor vs felony charges
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Whether definitions of 'rioting' are overly broad versus appropriately punitive
Narrow, enforceable change favors passage in a chamber prioritizing immigration enforcement, but mandatory language, civil‑liberties concer…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and narrowly scoped substantive amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act that specifies new grounds for visa revocation and deportability for certa…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.