Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
This bill reauthorizes and updates the Job Corps program through FY2026–2031, renaming centers as 'campuses' and specifying annual funding levels. It expands eligibility categories, updates operator selection using measurable performance metrics, applies the Service Contract Act to operators, raises staffing wage expectations, strengthens behavioral management and incident reporting, and authorizes construction funds for campuses.
Discipline approach: zero-tolerance and law-enforcement vs restorative practices
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed substantive reauthorization and amendment of the Job Corps statutory framework.
This bill reauthorizes and updates the Job Corps program through FY2026–2031, renaming centers as 'campuses' and specifying annual funding levels.
It expands eligibility categories, updates operator selection using measurable performance metrics, applies the Service Contract Act to operators, raises staffing wage expectations, strengthens behavioral management and incident reporting, and authorizes construction funds for campuses.
Substantive but technical reauthorization with funding improves prospects; contested labor and budgetary elements and Senate procedure reduce overall odds.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed substantive reauthorization and amendment of the Job Corps statutory framework. It includes specific operational mechanisms, funding authorizations, and a strong measurement and accountability regime while relying on executive implementation for some technical details.
Discipline approach: zero-tolerance and law-enforcement vs restorative practices
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Discipline approach: zero-tolerance and law-enforcement vs restorative practices
Likely broadly supportive: the bill increases funding, expands eligibility to opportunity youth, and strengthens worker pay and accountability.
Concerns would focus on disciplinary policies, law-enforcement agreements, and ensuring behavioral rules are equitable and not punitive.
Generally favorable but pragmatic: the bill modernizes oversight, clarifies operator selection, and increases funding, while raising concerns about cost, administrative complexity, and implementation details.
Support would depend on clear budgeting and phased implementation.
Skeptical overall: the bill increases federal spending, imposes wage and contracting mandates, and creates more federal reporting and oversight.
Support might be limited to provisions improving safety and workforce results if federal mandates are restrained.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Substantive but technical reauthorization with funding improves prospects; contested labor and budgetary elements and Senate procedure reduce overall odds.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Discipline approach: zero-tolerance and law-enforcement vs restorative practices
Substantive but technical reauthorization with funding improves prospects; contested labor and budgetary elements and Senate procedure redu…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed substantive reauthorization and amendment of the Job Corps statutory framework. It includes specific operational mechanisms, funding authorizations, and…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.