H.R. 2290 (119th)Bill Overview

World War II Women's Memorial Location Act

Public Lands and Natural Resources|District of ColumbiaMonuments and memorials
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Mar 24, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 240.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This Act permits the World War II Women’s commemorative work authorized in section 702 of division DD of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 to be located on the National Mall. Specifically, it allows siting within Area I (per a specified map) or within the Reserve, notwithstanding 40 U.S.C. 8908(c), and defines “Reserve” by cross-reference to 40 U.S.C. 8902(a)(3).

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize symbolic recognition and equity benefits

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused administrative/operational statute that clearly and directly creates a limited exception to an existing location restriction so that a specific commemorative work may be situated in identified areas of the National Mall.

This Act permits the World War II Women’s commemorative work authorized in section 702 of division DD of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 to be located on the National Mall.

Specifically, it allows siting within Area I (per a specified map) or within the Reserve, notwithstanding 40 U.S.C. 8908(c), and defines “Reserve” by cross-reference to 40 U.S.C. 8902(a)(3).

Passage80/100

Very narrow, administrative fix with limited fiscal impact; typically amenable to quick congressional and administrative approval.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused administrative/operational statute that clearly and directly creates a limited exception to an existing location restriction so that a specific commemorative work may be situated in identified areas of the National Mall.

Contention38/100

Progressives emphasize symbolic recognition and equity benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitPlaces recognition of wartime women on the National Mall, increasing national visibility.
  • Potential benefitLikely increases tourism and educational visits to the memorial and surrounding National Mall sites.
  • Local governmentsMay generate local economic activity from visitor spending and related service jobs.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenCreates a legislative exception that could set precedent for bypassing Mall placement restrictions.
  • Federal agenciesAdds incremental maintenance and security costs for the National Park Service and federal government.
  • Potential burdenCould affect Mall landscape, open space, archaeological resources, or existing site planning.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize symbolic recognition and equity benefits
Progressive90%

Likely supportive; sees the bill as correcting historical omission by allowing a high-visibility Mall location for women’s wartime contributions.

May push for inclusive interpretation, accessible design, and educational programming tied to the memorial.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Pragmatically favorable but cautious.

Supports honoring WWII women in principle, while wanting clear process, minimal impacts on existing Mall planning, and assurances about funding and maintenance responsibilities.

Split reaction
Conservative35%

Mixed to somewhat opposed.

May appreciate honoring WWII service but opposes making exceptions to Mall siting rules and using premier federal land without strong cause.

Prefers private, off‑Mall sites and limits on federal obligations.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood80/100

Very narrow, administrative fix with limited fiscal impact; typically amenable to quick congressional and administrative approval.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Stakeholder objections over Mall space and precedent
  • Funding source and long-term maintenance responsibilities
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize symbolic recognition and equity benefits

Very narrow, administrative fix with limited fiscal impact; typically amenable to quick congressional and administrative approval.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused administrative/operational statute that clearly and directly creates a limited exception to an existing location restriction so that a specific…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis