Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Requires heads of federal agencies to publish an annual, itemized report on all "official time" authorized under 5 U.S.C. 7131. Reports must include per-employee pay and hours, aggregate costs for negotiations, travel, arbitrator fees, property use, and other related expenses.
Privacy vs transparency: liberals worry about PII; conservatives prioritize disclosure
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified reporting mandate that enumerates granular required data elements and assigns responsible actors and schedules, but it omits key implementation scaffolding such as funding, privacy and aggregation rules, standardized calculation methodology, and compliance enforcement.
Requires heads of federal agencies to publish an annual, itemized report on all "official time" authorized under 5 U.S.C. 7131.
Reports must include per-employee pay and hours, aggregate costs for negotiations, travel, arbitrator fees, property use, and other related expenses.
The Comptroller General must audit agency accounting for these items at least once every four years and brief authorizing committees if agencies fail to use generally accepted accounting principles.
Administratively narrow but politically sensitive; low fiscal impact helps, yet partisan labor implications and implementation disputes lower overall prospects.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified reporting mandate that enumerates granular required data elements and assigns responsible actors and schedules, but it omits key implementation scaffolding such as funding, privacy and aggregation rules, standardized calculation methodology, and compliance enforcement.
Privacy vs transparency: liberals worry about PII; conservatives prioritize disclosure
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Privacy vs transparency: liberals worry about PII; conservatives prioritize disclosure
Sees transparency of public spending as a legitimate aim but has major concerns about employee privacy and union-bargaining integrity.
Worries the bill singles out union activity for scrutiny and may chill collective bargaining participation.
Supports oversight but would press for privacy protections and anti-retaliation safeguards.
Views the bill as pro-accountability and reasonable, but recognizes tradeoffs.
Sees value in standardized reporting and GAO audits while noting likely administrative cost and privacy concerns.
Would favor modest modifications to protect personally identifiable information and limit paperwork.
Likely to strongly support the bill as a necessary transparency and accountability measure for taxpayer-funded union time.
Views detailed, public reporting and GAO audits as tools to deter misuse and control federal spending.
Would push for strict enforcement and public access to the data.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Administratively narrow but politically sensitive; low fiscal impact helps, yet partisan labor implications and implementation disputes lower overall prospects.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Privacy vs transparency: liberals worry about PII; conservatives prioritize disclosure
Administratively narrow but politically sensitive; low fiscal impact helps, yet partisan labor implications and implementation disputes low…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified reporting mandate that enumerates granular required data elements and assigns responsible actors and schedules, but it omits key implementation sc…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.