Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
The bill amends the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 to authorize USDA contracts with eligible trade organizations to provide technical assistance that improves foreign-market infrastructure for U.S. agricultural exports. Assistance may include needs assessments, training, and upgrades to cold chain capacity, ports, and related developments.
Scale and adequacy of funding versus expected impact
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates a targeted substantive change by adding a new authorized activity and funding stream within an existing agricultural trade program, with clear problem framing but limited operational, definitional, and accountability detail.
The bill amends the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 to authorize USDA contracts with eligible trade organizations to provide technical assistance that improves foreign-market infrastructure for U.S. agricultural exports.
Assistance may include needs assessments, training, and upgrades to cold chain capacity, ports, and related developments.
It authorizes $1,000,000 annually for fiscal years 2026–2030 for these activities and restricts the funds to the stated purposes.
Small, technical, and narrowly targeted bill has favorable content profile, but still needs separate appropriations and schedule for enactment.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates a targeted substantive change by adding a new authorized activity and funding stream within an existing agricultural trade program, with clear problem framing but limited operational, definitional, and accountability detail.
Scale and adequacy of funding versus expected impact
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Scale and adequacy of funding versus expected impact
Likely cautiously supportive: the bill addresses food loss and infrastructure in developing markets, aligning with goals to reduce waste and improve nutrition.
Concerns would focus on ensuring benefits reach local communities, avoid propping up harmful practices, and include environmental safeguards for refrigeration emissions.
Generally favorable: the program is narrowly targeted, low-cost, and focused on practical trade facilitation and waste reduction.
The centrist view will emphasize measurable outcomes, coordination with existing development programs, and safeguards against duplication.
Cautiously supportive on grounds of expanding markets and boosting exports, but wary of federal spending and using taxpayer funds overseas to benefit private firms.
Preference for tighter controls, private-sector cost-sharing, and clear export-return benchmarks.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Small, technical, and narrowly targeted bill has favorable content profile, but still needs separate appropriations and schedule for enactment.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Scale and adequacy of funding versus expected impact
Small, technical, and narrowly targeted bill has favorable content profile, but still needs separate appropriations and schedule for enactm…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates a targeted substantive change by adding a new authorized activity and funding stream within an existing agricultural trade program, with clear problem framing…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.