Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
This bill bars appropriated funds from being used to eliminate, consolidate, or restructure any Department of Education office that administers or enforces programs under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. It also forbids terminating, reassigning, or altering responsibilities of personnel in such offices and prevents contracting out or delegating administration or enforcement of those programs outside the Department.
Liberals stress protection against outsourcing and rights safeguards
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward appropriations-based administrative constraint that clearly identifies its target and implements a direct prohibition on use of funds for certain organizational changes related to IDEA administration.
This bill bars appropriated funds from being used to eliminate, consolidate, or restructure any Department of Education office that administers or enforces programs under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
It also forbids terminating, reassigning, or altering responsibilities of personnel in such offices and prevents contracting out or delegating administration or enforcement of those programs outside the Department.
Narrow, low-cost bill improves chances, but standalone status and limits on executive flexibility reduce probability.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward appropriations-based administrative constraint that clearly identifies its target and implements a direct prohibition on use of funds for certain organizational changes related to IDEA administration. It cites the relevant statutory framework and uses standard funding-language mechanisms.
Liberals stress protection against outsourcing and rights safeguards
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals stress protection against outsourcing and rights safeguards
Likely strongly supportive.
The bill protects federal oversight of IDEA implementation, prevents privatization, and preserves staff focused on students with disabilities.
Progressives would view it as reinforcing congressional intent and civil rights protections for disabled students.
Generally favorable but cautious.
The bill defends statutory structures and protects vulnerable students, but it limits executive management flexibility.
Moderates will weigh the bill's protective intent against potential administrative rigidity and cost implications.
Likely skeptical to opposed.
While supportive of protecting students, conservatives will object to restricting executive authority and prohibiting delegation or contracting, which can limit efficiency and state flexibility.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, low-cost bill improves chances, but standalone status and limits on executive flexibility reduce probability.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals stress protection against outsourcing and rights safeguards
Narrow, low-cost bill improves chances, but standalone status and limits on executive flexibility reduce probability.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward appropriations-based administrative constraint that clearly identifies its target and implements a direct prohibition on use of funds for certain…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.