H.R. 2336 (119th)Bill Overview

Doris Miller Congressional Gold Medal Act

Armed Forces and National Security|Armed Forces and National Security
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Mar 25, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill directs Congress to award a posthumous Congressional Gold Medal to Doris Miller for valor during the December 7, 1941, attack on Pearl Harbor. The Secretary of the Treasury will design and strike the medal, which will be given to the Smithsonian for display; duplicate bronze versions may be sold to recoup costs.

Why people may split

Liberals stress racial-justice symbolism; conservatives stress honoring military valor.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative statute that establishes the factual basis for honoring Doris Miller, delegates operational details to the standard implementing entities (Secretary of the Treasury / U.S. Mint, Smithsonian), and provides basic funding and disposition authorities.

This bill directs Congress to award a posthumous Congressional Gold Medal to Doris Miller for valor during the December 7, 1941, attack on Pearl Harbor.

The Secretary of the Treasury will design and strike the medal, which will be given to the Smithsonian for display; duplicate bronze versions may be sold to recoup costs.

The United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund may be used to cover production costs, and findings recount Miller’s service, Navy Cross award, and death in action in 1943.

Passage85/100

Narrow, noncontroversial commemoration with minimal fiscal impact typically succeeds; main obstacles are procedural scheduling and potential holds.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative statute that establishes the factual basis for honoring Doris Miller, delegates operational details to the standard implementing entities (Secretary of the Treasury / U.S. Mint, Smithsonian), and provides basic funding and disposition authorities.

Contention10/100

Liberals stress racial-justice symbolism; conservatives stress honoring military valor.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRecognizes and commemorates Doris Miller’s World War II valor, raising national awareness of his service.
  • Potential benefitProvides a Smithsonian display and research resource for public education about military and civil rights history.
  • Potential benefitSells bronze duplicates to offset production costs and potentially generate modest revenue for the Mint fund.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesUses United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund resources, creating small federal expenditures without explicit Congress…
  • Potential burdenCould set precedent for additional Congressional Gold Medal requests, increasing future administrative and production b…
  • Potential burdenSale and duplication of medals may commercialize a commemorative honor, raising ethical or reputational concerns.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals stress racial-justice symbolism; conservatives stress honoring military valor.
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive as a formal correction and public recognition of an African-American service member denied full recognition in his era.

Views the medal as an important symbolic act advancing racial justice, public history, and institutional acknowledgment of past discrimination.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Generally supportive as a noncontroversial, bipartisan honor for military bravery with limited fiscal impact.

Will weigh symbolic value against the measure’s scope and administrative details like cost coverage and display plans.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Likely supportive of honoring wartime heroism and promoting patriotic history, but some may question federal involvement in commemorative items.

Overall viewed as a modest, respectful recognition of a WWII service member.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood85/100

Narrow, noncontroversial commemoration with minimal fiscal impact typically succeeds; main obstacles are procedural scheduling and potential holds.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Committee scheduling and prioritization
  • Potential single-member holds or procedural objections
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals stress racial-justice symbolism; conservatives stress honoring military valor.

Narrow, noncontroversial commemoration with minimal fiscal impact typically succeeds; main obstacles are procedural scheduling and potentia…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative statute that establishes the factual basis for honoring Doris Miller, delegates operational details to the standard implementing en…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis