H.R. 2345 (119th)Bill Overview

Ocmulgee Mounds National Park and Preserve Establishment Act

Public Lands and Natural Resources|Advisory bodiesEmployee hiring
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Mar 25, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill redesignates Ocmulgee Mounds National Historical Park as Ocmulgee Mounds National Park, establishes the Ocmulgee Mounds National Preserve once sufficient land is acquired, and authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire lands from willing sellers (no eminent domain). It requires a single-unit administration and a management plan (within 3 years) with tribal consultation, establishes an advisory council with tribal representation, takes about 126 tribal acres into trust, and authorizes necessary appropriations.

Why people may split

Tribal trust land and hiring preference praised by liberals; seen as preferential by conservatives.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive statutory vehicle to redesignate an existing National Historical Park, create a National Preserve unit, enable land acquisition from willing sellers, place specified tribal land into trust, and establish an advisory council and management planning requirements.

The bill redesignates Ocmulgee Mounds National Historical Park as Ocmulgee Mounds National Park, establishes the Ocmulgee Mounds National Preserve once sufficient land is acquired, and authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire lands from willing sellers (no eminent domain).

It requires a single-unit administration and a management plan (within 3 years) with tribal consultation, establishes an advisory council with tribal representation, takes about 126 tribal acres into trust, and authorizes necessary appropriations.

The bill requires protection and access for sacred and cultural sites, allows hunting and fishing in the preserve consistent with law, and preserves existing Fish and Wildlife Service management of Bond Swamp NWR except for cultural programming collaboration.

Passage45/100

Place-based NPS bills often advance; trust land and open-ended funding add friction and create uncertainty at later procedural stages.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive statutory vehicle to redesignate an existing National Historical Park, create a National Preserve unit, enable land acquisition from willing sellers, place specified tribal land into trust, and establish an advisory council and management planning requirements. It includes numerous statutory cross-references and operational provisions appropriate to park establishment.

Contention55/100

Tribal trust land and hiring preference praised by liberals; seen as preferential by conservatives.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · WorkersLocal governments · States

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitPreserves and interprets tribal archaeological sites and sacred places for cultural protection.
  • Federal agenciesTransfers approximately 126 acres into federal trust for the Tribe, strengthening tribal land protections.
  • WorkersCreates an advisory council with Tribal representation to inform collaborative land management.
Likely burdened
  • Local governmentsAcquisition of lands for the unit may reduce local property tax revenue and tax base.
  • Local governmentsFederal administration could impose regulatory constraints affecting neighboring landowners and local development.
  • StatesPlacing Tribal fee land into trust changes criminal and civil jurisdiction, affecting state authority and taxation.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Tribal trust land and hiring preference praised by liberals; seen as preferential by conservatives.
Progressive85%

Generally favorable.

The bill recognizes tribal cultural sites, provides trust land status, requires tribal consultation, and mandates preservation planning.

Some provisions, like hunting allowances and retention of military overflight authority, may raise concerns about cultural sensitivity and site protection.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Cautiously supportive.

The bill balances preservation, tribal consultation, and recreational uses while forbidding eminent domain.

Concerns focus on funding clarity, acquisition timing, and practical administration details to avoid local disruption.

Leans supportive
Conservative40%

Mixed to skeptical.

Supports local economic benefits and preserved hunting/fishing rights but worries about federal expansion, hiring preferences, and unfunded mandates.

The prohibition on eminent domain is positive, but trust land and vague appropriations raise concerns.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Place-based NPS bills often advance; trust land and open-ended funding add friction and create uncertainty at later procedural stages.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or Congressional Budget Office score included
  • Extent of formal consent and support from the named Tribe
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Tribal trust land and hiring preference praised by liberals; seen as preferential by conservatives.

Place-based NPS bills often advance; trust land and open-ended funding add friction and create uncertainty at later procedural stages.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive statutory vehicle to redesignate an existing National Historical Park, create a National Preserve unit, enable land acquisition from…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis